Reposted by Steve G
I hope people understand that what we are seeing is the systematic destruction of the civil war amendments by the Supreme Court, which are what made America and actual democracy and upon which all minority rights in the United States rely
50 replies
1390 reposts
3396 likes
I think ... Justice Thomas, let me check this ... yes, in order to truthfully call something a lie, it actually has to be a lie. Happy to clarify. What is it you do for a living, again?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I'm with you. People forget how self-destructive Trump is. This is another example of him confusing his little cult with the whole electorate. Both conviction & jail will hurt his, he's just not smart enough to realize it. Trump is Biden's biggest asset.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Stated more succinctly: "My little peanut brain can't imagine anything I'd like to do as President that ISN'T a crime, so ... immunity!"
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
why when I see that image it always reminds me of this image???
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Back in my days as a political scientist, I experienced this many times. I also found that other political scientists could be just as wrong about things I knew were true. Then, as I got older, I learned most of what I thought was true back then was also wrong. Epistemic humility for all, please.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Let's just pretend there is nothing distinctive and non-representative about 1,000 people who choose to pick up the phone vs. 93,000 people who choose not to. Polling is no longer about info-gathering, it's about performance art.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Opinion polls have evolved from honestly answering questions to performance art. Everybody knows the "right" answer & will provide it on demand. Weighting is used to get any response you want. I'm still a big fan of Zaller & Feldman's 1992 "“A simple theory of the survey response". You?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
guilty-as-sin guy says what?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Nice cosmetics, but I'm pretty sure all our adversaries' intelligence services have known where to find the good stuff for some time now. (horse, meet barn door)
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
#NYTimes says today "the United States now sits almost evenly divided between #Dems and #Repubs" But in the fine print, we see the data for this claim is from a Aug 2023 Pew survey. Writing about an 8 month old survey as "now" seems a little iffy to me. www.nytimes.com/2024/04/09/u...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Thank goodness nobody who will actually decide the outcome of this election (the undecided and politically inert) reads the New York Times.
0 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
Does Donald Trump qualify for pretrial detention? Criterion is: threat to safety of the community. Glenn Kirschner on MSNBC today:
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
When you're allowed to cheat, it's not that hard. Trump's next goal: beating Kim Jong-Il's 38 under par, including 11 holes-in-one, reported in N Korean news in 1994. And it was the first round of golf he'd ever played. You need to up your lying game, Donnie!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
#DavidCalhoun was a disaster at Nielsen well before he was a disaster at #Boeing. It always amazes me that guys like this always seem to fail UP. not down. Looking forward to his next big CEO job, maybe in #energy, #insurance, or #healthcare?
1 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
Thanks for doing the due diligence on this, Mitchell. Given that #Trump 's drop dead date is in 3 days, not 6 months, this is essentially a non-issue. Interesting that #WaPo mentions the lockup in the headline, #NYTimes waits til the next to last paragraph.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reads better in the original Russian, I think.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Where would #Trump be without having the Times to carry his water for him?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Greg Abbott would like to do at the southern border what Bibi Netanyahu is doing in Gaza. He's just been given carte blanche by our totally compromised SCOTUS. Six "conservatives" have ruined that institution. SCOTUS now reflects neither the rule of law nor majority American values.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It took years for the #NYTimes to reluctantly start using the words "liar" and "lies" in #Trump stories. How long before they're willing to use the word "deranged"? Or maybe "existential threat to democracy & the survival of humanity"?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This may not be as positive as you seem to think it is.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Learned some valuable minutia about how the House actually works along the way. Well worth the temporary freakout.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Adding this here: The fundamental flaw in this story is the idea that Johnson would still be Speaker at noon on Jan 3 (he would not) and that he could refuse certificates willy nilly to create a GOP majority (he could not). So, assuming Dems get a majority in Nov, this scenario is impossible. Whew!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The fundamental flaw in the story is the idea that Johnson would still be Speaker at noon on Jan 3 (he would not) and that he could refuse certificates willy nilly to create a GOP majority (he could not). So, assuming Dems get a majority in Nov, this scenario is impossible. Whew! /2
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I recently asked for feedback on an article by Thom Hartmann describing a doomsday scenario in which Mike Johnson could essentially nullify an elected Dem majority in the House and throw the House, and then the Presidency, to the GOP. Since I put it out, I want to roll it back. 1/
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Thanks for this detailed reply, Peter. So the flaw is the idea that Johnson would still be Speaker at noon on Jan 3 (he would not) and he could refuse certificates willy nilly to create a GOP majority (he could not). So, assuming Dems get a majority in Nov, this scenario is impossible. Whew!
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
by all means, show me the holes!
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I hope you're right, but I can't see the DOJ launching Smith's Jan 6 trial 2 months before the election. It would be seen as a massive thumb on the scales. The MAGA right would explode and it might even get Trump elected.
3 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Just getting my sea legs here on Bluesky. I'm wondering if people have seen this article by Thom Hartmann, and what you all think about it.
Trump could take over even if Biden gets 270+ electoral votes. Don't read on a full stomach.
hartmannreport.com/p/the-new-ov...
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Garland decides whether to prosecute. Without that, there's nothing for the judge to handle.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
If you're interested in how Trump could take over even if Biden gets 270+ electoral votes, read this (but, I suggest, not right before eating).
hartmannreport.com/p/the-new-ov...
1 replies
1 reposts
0 likes
Marick Garland will not allow a trial to start in Sept. Violates the DOJ "guideline" (nothing mandatory about it) that they don't do stuff during the Fall campaign. Unless it's Comey. And unless it's Hillary. But it will never, ever be Trump.
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
My immediate thought was that the clown who wrote this letter, Bradley Weinsheimer, might be a Trump appointee leftover. A quick google says "oh yeah". Appointed Assoc Deputy Attorney General & Pardon Attorney in 2018, Assoc Deputy Attorney General in 2019. Pardon Attorney! What a job!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
More civilized than Tennessee, I see.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I remember reading some social psych studies that attempted to show this name-as-destiny effect. More people named Louis living in St. Louis. More dentists named Dennis or Denise. Then they were all debunked for shoddy statistics.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes