Reposted by Warren Terra
In retrospect, the NYT Spelling Bee’s blithe refusal to care about words that are in the dictionary should have struck more word nerds as symptomatic.
5 replies
7 reposts
68 likes
A lot of journalists claim to have important inside sources reinforcing the narrative, but on the other hand there's so many ways that could be bullshit, or at least highly unrepresentative.
If you have the right job and want to cultivate a reporter who will be useful later, you can be that source!
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
Reminds me of how all the "Effective Altruism" movement ever seemed to do with its backer's great wealth was buy castles at which they planned to hold conferences on the theme of how great Effective Altruism was going to be, and give small grants to writers so they could talk about the same thing.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I'm pretty sure they're just making a joke about how the flamboyant clothing and the weird stance and expression and position all make it look like a haunting.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I don't really have a problem with the clip, but the people using the word this way really need to contemplate the history of using the word "coconut" to refer to people.
0 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
They eventually pushed the plan through despite the sane people calling it cruel and dishonest and the courts calling it illegal and every analyst calling it fiscal insanity, just got Parliament to say nope to all that.
They then symbolically deported one volunteer, after which I think no-one else.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I am naturally inclined to a little sympathy for the way the Tories left the non-white, non-Christian guy holding the bag, but also he embraced all the worst things about the party (Rwanda deportations, tried to kill the country's climate mitigation plan, etc) and he's a weird billionaire, fk him.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
The line-up:
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I think you'll enjoy this one:
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Have you seen this?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I think Trump benefits from COVID's weird effects on societal memory (tho less so among online political obsessives).
We do a terrible job of remembering the pandemic, and also any weirdness and failure gets blamed on the virus, as if Trump hadn't been personally responsible for so very much of it.
1 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
Also, complaints of this nature would be significantly more impressive if they were to come from foreign allies who were doing a better job of opposing Putin than our allies actually are.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
I also voted for him both times (don't recall how I voted in the primaries). I pay less attention to him than would be necessary to really find him sleazy, but I'm aware it's common.
I've never heard much good said about him, though people sometimes appreciate having a loud Dem as Governor.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I think of him as the box a real candidate comes in. He's shaped like a candidate, all the obvious boxes get ticked, but he satisfies no-one, no-one likes him or wants him as the real candidate.
2 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
One would hope she's not being consulted. There's several *different* reasons not to include her!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It really isn't though, as one would expect.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Apparently per some Google image searching it's Jeanne Shaheen
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I don't think it would actually be bullshit, but I worry it could effectively be portrayed as bullshit.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Yeah, I know, I was reasonably careful in the distinction I made.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yes, exactly.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
There is an idea called "Murc's Law" after the blog commenter who coined it: "only Democrats have agency". No-one asks Trump to be diligent, or honest, or informed, or follow the law. No mainstream outlet ever made it a national crisis for a week that he manifestly never has been any of those.
0 replies
8 reposts
23 likes
Or there was the time the NYT dedicated five reporters and 14 months to reporting on the money Trump inherited. They started in Feb 2017 - a year earlier it might have affected the election - and discovered he'd used blatant fraud to duck taxes on a billion dollars. But it was never a lasting story.
1 replies
3 reposts
18 likes
I remember some outlet reported *once* that there were civil servants whose job it was to recover documents that had been on Trump's desk - so were required to be preserved by the Presidential Records Act - and try to salvage them from his waste bin. Tape the torn shreds back together, for example.
1 replies
1 reposts
14 likes
It was a feature of liberal commentary. It was not taken seriously in the national mainstream pundit commentary, certainly was never the subject of a massive united media push like we're seeing with Biden.
Trump's failings and even his crimes would get reported, then they were no longer "news".
1 replies
1 reposts
23 likes
A cliche says antisemitism is the socialism of fools, and I think it might have worked the same way in our nation's history for democracy not socialism, and with a whole range of and whole series of vicious bigotries. "democracy" working because the electors could exclude and oppress some Other.
1 replies
3 reposts
10 likes
I have a halfway serious theory that exactly this phenomenon is maybe why our democracy lasted for a couple centuries and is now seemingly failing: for most of that time there were whole classes in society denied their rights, even unto death, and the license to oppress them was a relief valve.
1 replies
2 reposts
13 likes
Before that, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, and John Major were all about 6' tall (only Blair got the job by election). Thatcher was apparently 5'5".
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Cameron is also the last British PM to get the job by general election, before Starmer just did (May, Johnson, Truss, and Sunak all got the job by their predecessor's resignation, though May and Johnson later won general elections).
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Mind you, the op-ed is not generally speaking good. This guy spent years as a Republican apparatchik, he presumably drank the Flavor-Aid. His brief defense of the Court killing the regulatory state is bullshit, and he doesn't really pretend it isn't. But on the Trump decisions he's pretty clear.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I (and others) think this op-ed's Republican author wrote it to condemn some Trump-related decisions as unprincipled and wrong. A worthy goal!
This only makes the NYT editors' decisions *more* baffling: why not disclose the author clerked for Roberts? Why are the headline and subhed such a waffle?
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Quinta Jurecic posted that earlier today on Bluesky, reposted by some other law bloggers. I haven't read it, don't know the score.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
From right:
Count Binface
Some dude
Ventriloquist
Dummy
Dummy
Tall dude with "L" sign
Dummy
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I don't think it explains the results this time - the Tory plus Reform vote is eight points less then the Tory plus Brexit vote five years ago - but it would be really funny if the Tories lost so not because ten or so years ago they screwed their Lib Dem coalition partners who wanted voting reform.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I really should have added that the dummies are third and fourth from right.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
No, on the right is Count Binface. The ventriloquist is second from right.
1 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
I was struck by that, too.
But, the Conservative plus Reform total is 38% not 48%.
Also, the low total for Labour might reflect increased tactical voting in constituencies where people who wasted a vote on locally third party Labour in 2019 voted Liberal Democrat this time around.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The date isn't hilarious.
She lost her case and a judge ruled she's a vicious, borderline criminally violent troll back in November.
This event is in response to Tuesday's revelations that she openly self-identified as a Nazi and an avid reader of Mein Kampf, and even so it took a good 48 hours.
0 replies
0 reposts
11 likes
Wow, amazing.
0 replies
3 reposts
14 likes
Did you see this one?
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
I'm not entirely sure "lies constantly" captures it. I see no reason to think Trump has any idea what the truth is, that he's misrepresenting. More than that, I don't think he remotely cares what the truth is.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I have mediocre German, usually good enough to understand slogans and such, but I couldn't figure out Thällmann. Turns out it's an individual person's surname.
2 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Sub-things that should remain sub-things:
Yes: subtexts, subtweets, submarine sandwiches
Temporarily: actual submarines
No: subpar things. Except golfers.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Oh, dammit. My apologies to Estonia. My sympathies to Slovenia.
3 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
Some of them must be going for the hat trick with bigotry against her husband.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Still kinda surprised he didn't opt for a regnal name other than "Charles". Bad vibes.
3 replies
0 reposts
7 likes