David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈's avatar

David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈

@whysharksmatter.bsky.social

Something that's perhaps worth considering in the "does throwing soup at paintings/ paint on Stonehenge help change minds about climate change action" discourse is that this question has been studied and we have data.

3 replies 28 reposts 73 likes


Katharine Hayhoe's avatar Katharine Hayhoe @katharinehayhoe.com
[ View ]

Precisely my point. It’s interesting (as well as ironic and discouraging) how some who follow the science on climate—and are infuriated by others who don’t—are not always interested in following the science on public opinion, effective messaging & framing, and how to catalyze change.

1 replies 6 reposts 32 likes


Gloria! 's avatar Gloria! @smilodonichthys.bsky.social
[ View ]

I think it has to provide something for the public to do after. Someone suggested planting wildflowers in golf courses. That would be confronting, but it also might give people the idea of using more native plants in their own yards too.

2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈's avatar David Shiffman, Ph.D. 🦈 @whysharksmatter.bsky.social
[ View ]

FWIW, my personal approach to advocacy is notably less...raw than this stuff. I write op-eds. I speak to the public at museum "evening with a scientist" nights. Etc. Sometimes it works (see case study below). Sometimes it doesn't.

conbio.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....

3 replies 1 reposts 20 likes