|
Willem Huiskamp@willemh.bsky.social |
Carbon footprints among different income deciles in Germany are pretty similar.... until you look at transport. Once again, a very strong argument for a frequent fliers tax.
www.diw.de/documents/pu...
3 replies 37 reposts 80 likes
|
Dorothy Stein
@dorothystein.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Totally support frequent flyer tax! In the UK, 15% of population take 70% of all flights. But biggest source of emissions from highest wealth/income deciles is from their investments, not consumption. Lucas Chancel at World Inequality Lab has analysed this inequalitylab.world/en/
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@innerand
@innerand.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Not a tax. It has to be regulated / limited / forbidden. I mean it's the people with the highest incomes. They will just pay the tax and keep flying.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
@weedramatic.bsky.social
[ View ] |
also a strong argument for compressing incomes with much higher taxes at the high end
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes