SCOTUS: there’s nothing in the rule book that says a dog can’t play basketball
CITIZENS: what about the constitutional amendment that specifically bans dogs from playing basketball
SCOTUS: no that’s about something else
Yes, the rules say that dogs cannot play basketball, but in order for that to have effect, the league needs to authorize a separate review and enforcement process.
We cant just let each team decide for themselves which players are, or are not, in fact, dogs.
I feel like the way the decision was written, if Trump wins, states could still refuse to recognize him as President, maybe, though they can't stop him from running. ?
Listening to liberals cry today has been extremely satisfying.
When they bounce Fani on Friday it’s going to be this beautiful crescendo of butthurt like we haven’t seen in years. It really doesn’t get better than this folks.
"Biden is not securing the southern border and some of the people coming in are terrorists! He's giving aid and comfort to enemies of the United States, which makes him an insurrectionist, so he is barred from the ballot in TX, OK, TN, FL..."
You KNOW the Republicans would do this!
While I know Trump is a guilty POS, the issue is that many states are run by his corrupt party and will make up reasons to remove Biden for insurrection as they already accused him of it, and he's never done it. Just making the word meaningless is their game. Corruption, their methodology
I desperately want an absurd lawsuit that takes advantage of the equally absurd readings SCOTUS has been lately (since they're fairly predictable) to force some ridiculous law that's more joke than crippling. Change of pace, ya know?
HOMER SIMPSON: You don't win friends with salad!
SAM ALITO: The First Amendment says you have to be my friend if I offer you salad.
HOMER: But you're just eating the steak I grilled and not even touching your salad!
ALITO: That's not very friendly, Homer.
"Okay fine, there *is* a rule that says dogs can't play basketball, but if we enforce that rule, the other team might call *you* a dog, and then we'd have no idea who's a dog or not! We need the league to make regulations on who is and isn't a dog first, sorry."
Yeah, I noticed that the "devolution of powers!!!" bloc from RvW is suddenly real quiet when it's a power they don't personally want the states to have.
SCOTUS: Also, dogs can play anything they want, especially if it involves guns, and states can do nothing about it. Unless they're women dogs, then they can play basketball only if their husbands allow them. But if there are dishes in the sink, it's up to the state to decide.