Active Measures, LLC's avatar

Active Measures, LLC

@activemeasures.bsky.social

How does Roberts square his decision now with his repudiation of Korematsu, "The forcible relocation of U.S. citizens to concentration camps, solely and explicitly on the basis of race, is objectively unlawful and outside the scope of Presidential authority"? How is it so when you can't review acts?

4 replies 3 reposts 21 likes


Pwnallthethings's avatar Pwnallthethings @pwnallthethings.bsky.social
[ View ]

I mean, the simple answer is that he just doesn't

4 replies 1 reposts 52 likes


πš‚π™Ώπ™Ύπšπ™Ίπ™±π™Ύπ™Ύπšƒ's avatar πš‚π™Ώπ™Ύπšπ™Ίπ™±π™Ύπ™Ύπšƒ @sporkboot.bsky.social
[ View ]

don't gotta square vibes based legal decisions

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


muxauy's avatar muxauy @lanzz.org
[ View ]

"oh but it obviously very much depends on who the president is, I thought that was obvious and didn't need spelling out"

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Judge Muck's avatar Judge Muck @judgemuck.bsky.social
[ View ]

The Trump decision is terrible and the GOP justices don't care about consistency. However, the way the Trump case is squared with the Court's other cases (limiting fed power), is Trump involves criminal liability, the others largely deal with injunctions to stop or carry out some action.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes