Reposted by Birb at Arms
I'm still bullish on the US vs the UK long term, but as an aside, I'll gladly take "we pretend to give this guy total authority but if he tries to use it we'll chop HM Royal Head off again" over "the president is immune from all the crimes, as long as he's abusing his official power during them."
2 replies
17 reposts
113 likes
I don't know what it is about the UK in general but they all seem as eager to remind you that Biden is old as any NYT columnist
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
TBH the Economist are handling this worse than the New York Times, which isn't something I thought was possible.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It's sort of appropriate in that the fourth of July celebrates a bunch of British subjects telling the Tories to go fuck themselves, if you think about it
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
If I was Nigel Farage, I would also drink that much
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It's such a great train, and there's a France-sized chunk of land around the Great Lakes and the US northeast that could really use something like that.
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
I initially thought this might have been a typo for "mixed race" and would like to go back to that state of relative innocence
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I think a lot of people assume that because liking immigration is usually a left-wing position, immigrants and their descendants must necessarily be left wing.
It creates an expectation that can make interactions with actually existing Indians (/other diaspora) feel more jarring than they ought to.
1 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
I do think there's an important hypothetical to consider where the military mostly stays in their bases and says "look, you guys figure out who's in charge and come back to us."
Not *super* likely, but it has precedents in i.e. Ukraine in 2014.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I had a guy threaten me with "the guillotine" on the other site once, then block me when I offered to rent him a U-Haul.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The bad news would be that since SCOTUS delegated the right to decide what is or isn't an "official act" to itself, it would be unclear whether or not the immunity applied.
The good news, I'll leave to your imagination.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
One thing about guillotines is that you can only use them when your faction controls the area for long enough to indulge in construction projects.
The level of security required to use them seems to sort of contradict the claimed necessity of using them.
Also, they're terrible for threats.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Like, the Type of Guy who files a lawsuit like this pretty clearly believes that Candidate #2 is better.
0 replies
0 reposts
14 likes
RFK is truly a man of the world: eating dogs *and* pigs, and being eaten by a worm
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
The President saying in his SotU speech "I hope [political enemy] gets what he deserves, which might include falling out a window" would not be admissible as evidence, given that SotU is an official act.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
TBH I suspect that would be an improvement over the sentiment expressed in the story above.
1 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
The ruling on immunity for "official acts" explicitly gives SCOTUS the right to decide whether something is an "official act" or not.
So they haven't actually given the President any new powers that can be exercised without their consent.
2 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
Maybe sooner if the democrats had a trifecta.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
He could if the democrats control the Senate when Alito and Thomas die
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I mean, in any given presidential election, one of the two leading candidates is going to win. That's the reality, and it will happen regardless of whether you try to influence which one will win, or not.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I'm sure quite a few people have explained to you by now that Roe was overturned by Trump-appointed judges.
Is there any reason you keep using this framing device?
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
"Siri, what is an opportunity cost"
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Not to mention WWI, where on any given day between 1914 and 1918, the odds of allied artillery preemptively ending his political career were probably in the double digits.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Birb at Arms
I think this is the real deal threat of yesterday’s decision. The powers of the presidency weren’t expanded, but accountability for their use was stripped. There are cases where Trump could issue a criminal order and be immune, but the people carrying it out wouldn’t be. But…
2 replies
8 reposts
47 likes
Cops are cops, but the ones in larger departments screw up less and face more consequences when they do.
If you just want to ACAB-post, that's fine, but it's simply untrue to say there are no differences between PDs in the US.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The "military identity" generally isn't OK with killing large numbers of civilians in their own country. That doesn't just apply to the USA either; quite a few literal dictatorships have run into problems trying to do this, though it's not an insurmountable obstacle in either case.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The tech bro compulsion to invent trains is unstoppable
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Really, the worst PDs in the USA are the podunk rural forces that will give you a badge and a gun for showing up to your interview with pants on and whose training program consists of an afternoon learning to write a parking ticket.
These are not known for the institutional loyalty of their staff.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Loyalty to institutions is different from personal loyalty within the institution.
Loyalty to the institution makes you less likely to take actions that you know are against the institution's mission and values.
Loyalty to colleagues makes you more likely to go along with whatever they're doing.
2 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
AFAIK the big city PDs are relatively competent for the most part, but a lot of the smaller rural ones will give a badge and a gun to anyone who can write their own name and get through an interview without shitting their pants.
There's a correlation with accountability as well.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
And, you really shouldn't use Weimar comparisons to make points about the US government or military, because they're not at all alike.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Weimar Germany was about 15 years old when Hitler came to power. Its institutional cohesion was quite weak and most people had vivid memories of losing a world war and fighting a civil war.
The US is a very different country with a very different history, culture and political system.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
They're "militarized" in that they carry carbines and wear tac vests.
That doesn't mean they're fit for combat. Some are probably solid fighters, some couldn't win a fight even at a 20-1 numerical advantage.
Just ask the Uvalde PD.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Hitler had it easy because the size of the German military was limited by the treaty of Versailles. German rearmament happened on his watch, so he got to build the military almost from scratch.
And even then, they tried to kill him a few times.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
There are plenty of examples from militaries with a much greater willingness to shoot officers than the US.
Matvey Shaposhnikov, for example, was a Soviet general who refused to fire on protesters in Novocherkassk in 1962.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
There is a whole chain of command between the JCS chairman and Private Bloggins the infantryman, and all of them would be passing clarification questions back up the chain and taking steps to make sure they weren't the fall guy if anything bad happened. It would be a slow process.
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
The actually existing US military would "resist" mostly in the form of inertia.
Orders to suppress popular resistance would be subject to endless procedural questions and probably resignations if the administration called for violence too openly.
But this wouldn't last forever.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
That, and if the military is now an instrument of political violence, the loyalty of that instrument is crucial.
What that means for an officer is that your service is now a game of performing regime loyalty with career-ending or even life-ending consequences for the losers.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
During my brief and unremarkable career in the Canadian military, I had an older platoon sergeant who came across as a hard-right asshole but often said really feminist things.
Turns out, his mother had been arbitrarily kicked out of the military in the 1950s "so the men would have more jobs."
1 replies
0 reposts
11 likes
But as you've alluded to, this really comes down to the level of motivation of security forces and of any resistance, which is often hard to predict or gauge.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes