Extremely frustrating to hear legal experts analyzing the SCOTUS ruling on immunity like just another case - it's an inherently normalizing act. People need to stop playing constitutional Calvinball and treat them like political actors.
It really does sound like The Onion's joke news report on the shrieking white-hot sphere of pure rage that turned out to be incredibly prescient. Just acting like it's all completely normal. www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjon...
i’ve heard no mention of the text of the impeachment clause or federalist 69 in major media. it’s so obviously completely groundless. i think it’s important to scream about how this decision is an affront to the methods conservative justices say they follow
Connect the dots! Impeachment of the President for "High crimes and misdemeanors" no longer exists?
SCOTUS decisions can/must be reversed, but impeachment/conviction for dariliction of duty by certain justices needs to happen. They are blatantly violating their oaths to defend the Constitution.
The other part of this is that critiques should only be head-on and dismissive. None of this, it gets this or that precedent wrong. That takes these decisions as good faith arguments, which they aren’t. They are a weapon of power, not an academic treatise on the nature of sovereignty.
“Constitutional Calvinball” is a memorable coinage.
I even took a swing at memorializing it, late on Independence Day. With emojis.
I’d see myself out, but the historic echo to the Enabling Act of 1933 has been dogging me all week. History’s rhymes ring atonal.
Seriously, fuck all that. Roberts and his fascist cadre just put a knife in the back of the American body politic. They have no legitimacy and they should be tarred and feathered