Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
The fact that only the president enjoys complete immunity, and that he also has the power of pardon is part of what is so terrifying about the ruling.
It means that those beneath him are entirely at his good graces and arbitrary will. It's a power machine, not a check on his power.
4 replies
28 reposts
105 likes
What kind of illiberal lunacy is this? www.theguardian.com/politics/art...
Think of who you don't want in power. Now imagine them enforcing this law.
A society without misinformation is inherently unfree (and impossible).
1 replies
4 reposts
20 likes
I don't understand this point. Trump can just pardon them.
37 replies
28 reposts
218 likes
Some ex-DOJ officials who worked for Trump fear the Supreme Court just made it easy for him to use the DOJ to attack foes
“It sets him up to do the things he has said, to investigate people and send them to jail,” said one ex-official.
www.nbcnews.com/investigatio...
1 replies
14 reposts
89 likes
"Trump v. Anderson’s holding lacked any real basis in text and history and also is at odds with the basic structure of the Electoral College"
"The court’s reasoning [on immunity] went well beyond any specific part of the Constitution or any determinate constitutional tradition"
0 replies
4 reposts
16 likes
What would you say if you saw it in another country?
4 replies
10 reposts
39 likes
good question - ask the authors!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
What a creative research design x.com/JohnHolbein1...
Paper: t.co/KfeT7yV54c
2 replies
4 reposts
23 likes
Official act! He took them while in office - is it a crime here?
3 replies
8 reposts
54 likes
Democrats: The way Republicans blame uncomfortable realities on media bias is pathological and undermines their ability to grapple with hard truths.
Also (many) Democrats: The Joe Biden stories are the media's fault! The NYT is biased against him! etc etc etc
12 replies
6 reposts
46 likes
Extremely frustrating to hear legal experts analyzing the SCOTUS ruling on immunity like just another case - it's an inherently normalizing act. People need to stop playing constitutional Calvinball and treat them like political actors.
17 replies
170 reposts
797 likes
What I'm thinking about today 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
1 replies
20 reposts
91 likes
who did the walk out faster?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Refreshing myself on the end of season one of House of the Dragon after the first debate is ... something
2 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
Mitch McConnell offers an object lesson for all the Republicans who think they can tame this tiger -- even if you do everything in your power to advance Trump's agenda and sabotage two different impeachment trials that would remove him, the Felon Messiah King will still demand your head.
24 replies
177 reposts
722 likes
"over the past 20 years, the Republican-nominated Supreme Court justices who have now given Trump and other presidents a significant measure of immunity from criminal prosecution for their official acts assured Americans that nobody — not even a president — was 'above the law.'"
2 replies
11 reposts
24 likes
Betting markets already heavily Harris www.realclearpolling.com/betting-odds...
2 replies
2 reposts
12 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
I've seen surprisingly little coverage on the fact that, if I understand right, all jousting over an open nomination needs to be done two weeks *before* the convention starts. That, or Dems give up on Ohio (and throw Sen Brown under bus). Am I missing something?
www.nytimes.com/2024/05/28/u...
4 replies
2 reposts
10 likes
Ohio's written off I'm sure, but symbolically bad and definitely bad for Brown
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
Either the Democrats will run Biden, or he'll say he can't continue the campaign and Democrats will run Harris. Either is newsworthy, but neither is nearly as radical as running a pro-insurrection convicted felon with legal immunity he's eager to use.
17 replies
297 reposts
1114 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
Presidential candidate who the far-right members of the Supreme Court just placed above the law tells voters how he will exercise his new powers.
29 replies
230 reposts
572 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
One thing you can't say about the 6 justice majority is that they can't imagine or think a hypothetical parade of horribles won't happen. That's not this case. The wolf is at the door. The litigant in this case is the person who already was president, attempted a coup and is a career criminal.
4 replies
15 reposts
57 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
Aaron Sorkin brain worms
1 replies
5 reposts
25 likes
Lots of bizarro world denialism on here about how concerning Biden's state and behavior were. "74 percent of voters view him as too old for the job, up five percentage points since the debate." www.nytimes.com/2024/07/03/u... 74%! 59% among Democrats!
5 replies
4 reposts
23 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
While DOJ independence was already a dead letter for purposes of a second Trump term since Attorney General E. Trump or J. Turley or whoever will have been chosen expressly because he's willing to take orders, also worth noting that Roberts blessed POTUS telling AG whom to prosecute.
3 replies
46 reposts
204 likes
"Essentially, the Court in Trump v. United States is declaring the Constitution itself unconstitutional. Instead of properly starting with the Constitution’s text and structure, the Court has ended up repealing them."
1 replies
13 reposts
48 likes
good talk
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I have more confidence in the Secret Service than I think Josh does. I'm honestly not sure most potential assassins are clued in to the rules of presidential succession. And in general, how you weight it depends on what you think the effect of a Harris-Biden switch is.
2 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
bsky.app/profile/ryan...
0 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
true. but life is full of tradeoffs
4 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Shouldn't Democrats be pushing Biden to not only step aside from the nomination race but to resign and make Harris POTUS? Helps avoid a messy succession battle and raises her standing/status.
(Messy part is getting a VP confirmed; otherwise Johnson is second in line, but you live with it.)
19 replies
0 reposts
15 likes
Reminder that even if Democrats drag Biden or someone else over the finish line, the threats to democracy will still remain. One party winning every time is not a plan (nor a democracy). And the president will still have the power to commit crimes with impunity even if the next one doesn't use it.
7 replies
24 reposts
99 likes
Reminder that even if Democrats drag Biden or someone else over the finish line, the threats to democracy will still remain. One party winning every time is not a plan (nor a democracy). And the president will still have the power to commit crimes with impunity even if the next one doesn't use it.
1 replies
6 reposts
36 likes
Amazing. Shoot it into my v̶e̶i̶n̶s̶ shoulder muscle* www.nature.com/articles/d41...
*after appropriate regulatory and scientific approvals are completed
0 replies
3 reposts
47 likes
A world where the President can murder their enemies with impunity, direct the DOJ and FBI not to investigate the crimes, and pardon anyone who participates is not a free society www.politico.com/news/2024/07...
5 replies
46 reposts
159 likes
bsky.app/profile/noel...
3 replies
2 reposts
13 likes
Reposted by Brendan Nyhan
You can have concerns about Biden's age, but still be absolutely appalled about editorial choices that convey the issue as more important than the Supreme Court offering a pre-emptive thumbs up to a criminal presidency
17 replies
221 reposts
889 likes
Reminder that POTUS can direct the DOJ not to prosecute the trigger puller and, failing that, pardon anyone who carries out his order and still faces federal charges. Utterly lawless.
12 replies
33 reposts
127 likes
Category error watch. People keep assuming legal proceduralism will apply in an authoritarian state.
29 replies
117 reposts
659 likes
Real news in 2024. Not a drill. www.politico.com/news/2024/07...
7 replies
17 reposts
64 likes
What would you say if you saw it in another country?
14 replies
42 reposts
205 likes
Two things can be true:
1. The mental acuity of the person with the nuclear codes is a BIG deal. The media should report on it. Full stop.
2. The threat to democracy is also real and the overall balance of coverage must take that context into account.
3 replies
13 reposts
59 likes