|
CNN@cnn.com |
JUST IN: Donald Trump's attorneys have asked Judge Aileen Cannon to consider the Supreme Court's presidential immunity decision in his classified documents case in Florida.
7 replies 3 reposts 8 likes
|
Chuck Dowling
@chuckxl.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Nah man, fuck that.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
LeviathanCross27
@leviathancross27.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It has no bearing, whatsoever. The SCOTUS decision doesn't change the fact that he (1) stole classified information, (2) obstructed justice, (3) refused to return the materials when asked, repeatedly, and (4) he failed to properly secure them and showed them to people without classified clearance.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Gwen McNamara
@timeandagwen.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Accountabilabuddy
@accountabilabuddy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It might have been interesting if the "moderators" at that debacle last week had asked him about this, or about his terrorist attack against the capitol. Or corrected any of his lies. Or had anything resembling a debate.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
SFliberal FFS
@sfliberal.bsky.social
[ View ] |
He swindled us right in front of our collective eye. Desperate for a grand gesture from Biden that, hopefully, includes dozens of EOs, US Marshall's and handcuffs. But what tf do I know?
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
MindCrime
@mindcrime.bsky.social
[ View ] |
He was showing classified docs to people after he was in office. Why can't the next president take Air Force 1 home and keep it?
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
|
@processanalyzer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The problem is he refused to return the documents when he was told to, and wasn’t President at that time. Also he is burning through $10 million a month in legal costs in addition to the $750 million in damages owed.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes