|
E.J. Fagan@ejfagan.bsky.social |
I know that Heritage is a boogeyman right now, somewhat deserved. But as someone who has read more of their work product than pretty much anyone: this is not a well-oiled machine of an organization in 2024. They are less capable than ever at actually pulling off something like this.
6 replies 2 reposts 8 likes
|
RRRVVVWWW
@rrrvvvwww.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Isn’t the goal to simply provide the framework and then install the administration to carry it out? Likewise, simply push the legal framework out to the placed judges?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Scott Monje
@scottmonje.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The question, though, is whether they actually need to be a well-oiled machine if certain states are willing to take the bait.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
@roslynn.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Proof?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
E.J. Fagan
@ejfagan.bsky.social
[ View ] |
For example, read their "Index of Military Strength" - something they regard as a marquee work product. Who is this for? Does anyone expect a serious policymaker to use this to do anything? It's methodology is basically "researchers wave hands." It's purpose is to create an annual Fox News segment
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Heath Brown
@heathbrown.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Seems like as it’s abandoned its role as a think tank, in favor of advocacy, Heritage has sacrificed its ability to impact policy
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Scott Imberman
@imbernomics.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I thought that the ballot access in pretty much every state is for the Dem party and until he’s formally nominated Biden himself is not officially on any ballot.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes