The state can make us more prone to care for one another and collaborate—or more inclined to compete for seemingly scarce resources, more mistrustful and afraid.
@lhh.bsky.social and @astra.bsky.social on on what a "solidarity state" could look like:
1 replies
20 reposts
41 likes
Reposted by Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a floof
The answer to political anxiety is political organizing.
17 replies
184 reposts
739 likes
Objects in camera are way too floofy to fully capture
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
When the hooman won’t let u drive so u angry
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
2 replies
3 reposts
17 likes
Some Robert Cover to consider in light of some recent decisions
1 replies
5 reposts
18 likes
We shouldn’t think of law as always or even mostly a limitation on violence. At its best it is some violence for the sake of ultimately less violence. It always has a repressive edge. Quite often it is not at its best.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Cover’s focus was criminal law but the point generalizes. Law expresses, encodes, and distributes state power, and state power includes (though is not limited to) violence. The *intended* effect of the immunity decision is to redistribute control over violence—away from Congress, to the President.
1 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Some Robert Cover to consider in light of some recent decisions
1 replies
5 reposts
18 likes
The variance with her is astounding.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
“just somewhat unchecked”
0 replies
1 reposts
0 likes
When u hear a vicious rumor that somepawdy else is the good boi
0 replies
1 reposts
6 likes
Just happy your correctness is free, carry on
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Someone woke up and chose legal realism
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
When u hear a vicious rumor that somepawdy else is the good boi
0 replies
1 reposts
6 likes
They do move in herds
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
When bol is life
1 replies
4 reposts
19 likes
Reposted by Evan Bernick, a finite mode with a floof
Just a funny comic for pals to read!!
8 replies
138 reposts
603 likes
When bol is life
1 replies
4 reposts
19 likes
Also I’m coining the anti-cannibalism canon right now
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This is so glaringly obviously a policy judgment about which reasonable minds could differ and it’s articulated as it if it’s a clear constitutional command
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Creedal constitutionalism plus judicial supremacy plus bad democratic theory equals bad, democratically disempowering governance. We do have a power problem, it’s just not the one that a majority of very powerful judges is concerned with.
0 replies
2 reposts
5 likes
Which in turn is dressed up in rhetoric about how the Constitution inexorably commands all of this, which is bad for democracy not only because it is untrue but because it is nontransparent and it’s quite difficult to do anything about it.
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
This isn’t a one-off thing. It’s part of a larger project of aggrandizing judicial power over the metes and bounds of executive power at Congress’s expense, to the benefit of the President, based on wildly bad democratic theory.
1 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
To borrow a phrase, it’s about power. Not just the President’s—the Court’s.
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
It’s not so much that I expected better, it’s just that the formal legal reasons that Morrison is supposedly bad apply in full force to what a Morrison-hating majority just did. Which suggests that hey maybe they’re not actually decisive.
1 replies
1 reposts
2 likes