Reposted by Filipe Campante
SCOTUS is telling us that it has completely signed on to the project of a second Trump administration, which is establishing an elected autocracy.
48 replies
700 reposts
2858 likes
That's key: they create a totally blurry distinction between "official" and "unofficial" acts, to be enforced by them, which allows them to ensure that immunity applies to Republican presidents only. All the jokes about Biden calling on SEAL Team 6 can only reinforce this terrifying point.
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
That's it: very hard to understand/predict based on ConLaw, very easy to understand/predict based on Comparative Politics.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I guess the fact that they remain the “ultimate arbiter” is exactly what will allow the true objective to be achieved: immunity for Republican presidents only…
0 replies
3 reposts
9 likes
Wow, yet another “constitutional puzzle” where the Republican supermajority finds the answer to perfectly align with the interests of the Republican Party… Looking forward to legal scholars and SCOTUS journalists breaking down the doctrinal intricacies of this one! www.nytimes.com/live/2024/07...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Acho q não é questão de ser mais ou menos forte -- Trump demonstrou em 2016 q literalmente qualquer candidato de um dos dois partidos tem chances plausíveis. Trata-se de um problema de coordenação: nenhum democrata, individualmente, tem o incentivo de tomar a iniciativa, dados os riscos envolvidos.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
A Trump win in November will have dire consequences for democracy in Latin America: Bolsonaro’s son, fresh off his dad’s attempted coup after losing the 2022 election, is ominously saying that having Trump back “will pave the way for lots of things”… noticias.uol.com.br/politica/ult...
2 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
I agree, though I am firmly in the “Biden should step aside” camp. People who are anti-Harris, at this point, are part of the problem.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
My point is that parties only do it when they are in a very bad situation, and so it’s not surprising that they’re very likely to lose when they do it…
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Selection bias suggests that, in spite of that, it may not have been the wrong decision anyway.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It’s a horrible comparison, but brings to mind the 2016 coordination failure in the GOP that allowed Trump to get the nomination. Very different pathologies, but with fairly similar results from that perspective…
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I should have said “must be replaced”, rather than “should be replaced”.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
If you think Biden is a better option than Kamala, then by definition you must think that Biden is not in an unsustainable position.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Here’s one thing I do find incoherent: thinking that Biden should be replaced but not being ok with Kamala. Last night pushed me into the “Biden can’t do it” camp, but to me that has to include the position that Kamala replacing him is an acceptable solution.
2 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I honestly don’t understand the argument. I happen to think he’s capable of being president now, but after last night, it’s pretty clear that the odds of him being capable in three years are very bad. The election is a forward-looking decision, resigning is about now. What am I missing?
0 replies
1 reposts
6 likes
It’s like, “but these other bets have a lot of variance!” Yes, they do, but when the expected value of your current option goes sufficiently low, you actually need to chase variance!
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
People are seriously overthinking this. It’s obvious that all these alternative scenarios are costly, and potentially very much so, but they have one thing that, at this point, Biden simply doesn’t have: upside.
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
Not only that: their odds of being up to the task of being president in three years’ time are astronomically better than Biden’s. That affects their chances now, of course, but goes beyond that.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
That shouldn’t be hard to see. The most damning part of the debate is that, after last night, no one could possibly have any confidence that, in three years, Joe Biden will be minimally capable of performing the job of president.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Biden likes to say “don’t compare me to the Almighty, compare me to the alternative”. Since last night, the alternative “literally any other plausible Democratic nominee” is looking awfully appealing…
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Filipe Campante
einstein sent this to curie in 1911 when she was being harassed by tabloids. it contains everything you’d want in such a letter:
(1) your haters are trash
(2) you’re a baller, a true queen
(3) i have determined the statistical law of motion of the diatomic molecule in planck’s radiation field 🧪⚛️
37 replies
1466 reposts
3937 likes
People used to think that the decentralization of US elections was a bulwark’s against fraud, but that’s akin to when we thought the Internet would be the end of dictators. By now we should have learned that centralized control is overrated, when “flood the zone with shit” is an available strategy.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Sometimes the truth has to be stated emphatically…
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Referees were the MVPs of that run, one of the least compelling Cinderella stories in sports history.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
True fact. Dortmund had to survive a legitimately tough group to be in a position to get lucky with a relatively weak bracket.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
One difference between Euros and World Cup is that it's happened multiple times that truly mediocre teams have lucked out and managed to win the Euros (Denmark 92, Greece 04, Portugal 16). It's actually kind of weird that a knockout competition like the WC has never produced that.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Austria must be super excited, and rightly so, at a unique chance of making a deep run -- and who knows? even winning it all. It's happened before...
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Just as everyone else on that side -- that's exactly how Portugal won in 2016, Croatia got to the final in 2018, Dortmund got to the CL final this year, etc. etc.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Look, as good as Austria have been (and they haven't been thaaat good, Holland won the xG against them quite handily), and as uninspiring as France have been, anyone in their right mind would choose to face Austria rather than France. England got very lucky, no two ways about it...
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It would be such poetry if Italy, having just won consecutive Euros, then go on to miss the third World Cup in a row...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Still, a very bad Italy -- which could totally go on to win the tournament, would be the most stereotypically "Italy" thing ever.
2 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The lopsidedness of the Euro bracket is reaching the point where, if England don't get to the final, they should just shut up shop and let Scotland and Wales and Northern Ireland carry the torch.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes