Once again the Pragmatic Maxim (to paraphrase, “the thing is what it does”) brings clarity. You keep your buzzy YouTube philosopher bros, Charles Peirce and William James for the win.
What about when something is conceived and built for one purpose, but people come in charge who repurpose it in a different direction? Is there a distinction sometimes between what is meant to be, and what is in practice?
I had a whole graduate level semester seminar on Pragmatism with the legendary John Lachs at Vanderbilt. I would like to say I learned a lot but I had a one inch crack in my brain by the end of the second session and never caught up again
I feel like everyone should read How to Make Our Ideas Clear at least once.
I tend to go for Dewey most often but I teach high school kids about democracy, so of course I would.