Here's the most in-depth legal analysis of the congestion-pricing situation I've seen, by NYU law prof Rick Hills:
"As a matter of constitutional principle, it is perverse to construe a federal statute to give governors the power to shut down state law."
I liked this sentence in particular
(Alternatively, Polly Trottenberg, Deputy Secretary of USDOT, could save everyone a lot of trouble just by sending a tolling agreement with only three signature lines — one each for the MTA, the City of New York, and the FHWA)
At NYC comptroller Brad Lander's press conference—happening now—Columbia professor and environmental lawyer Michael Gerrard says they expect to file the first lawsuit in defense of the congestion-pricing plan within “a couple of weeks” (via Evan Simko-Bednarski, NYDN)
Well, if nothing else, as a Democrat, she's sending a bad message. Did she not read Timothy Snyder's book?
Rule 1 is DO NOT OBEY IN ADVANCE! Don't give the Republicans any ideas about letting the Supreme Court overrule state laws just for fun.
one thing that's still not clear: why has the FWHA still not delivered the agreement to sign? isn't that incredibly suspicious, given that congestion pricing was supposed to start in just a few weeks?