Reposted by Julian Hamann
my 2cents zum neuen Spin @BMBF
2 replies
7 reposts
28 likes
So kommuniziert die Leitung des BMBF intern über Wissenschaftler:innen.
1 replies
8 reposts
15 likes
Not professions, but fields/disciplines, but apart from that: yes. And I'm not merely looking for a term that designates the size or developmental status of fields (e.g., "niche fields"), but wondering whether the idea behind it exists: that academic diversity and specialization are valuable per se.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
But your example already shows that specialization suggests a broader field that the specialization belongs to. Same logic as sub-discipline. That's not what I was looking for, I was looking for "niche fields" that are independent from other fields.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Thanks, that's the impression I got as well.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Thanks y'all for your input and the interesting discussions. My takeaway: There's a concept of "niche fields", but it's less established and, remarkably, the term doesn't carry the idea of diversity and specialization that is to be preserved and valuable per se, which is the case for "Kleine Fächer"
0 replies
1 reposts
5 likes
Indeed, niche fields seems to comes closest. Thank you!
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Never heard of this, I'll see whether this comes up somewhere. Thanks!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Thanks. I would say "sub-" implies the field to be part of a larger field. This is not necessarily the case.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Thank you. I think "sub-" would imply the field to be part of a larger field, which is not necessarily the case.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Thank you, appreciate your input!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
You mean whether all/most Orchideenfächer are humanities? That's true in many cases, but I don't think being a humanities field is a necessary condition for an Orchideenfach. See here:
www.kleinefaecher.de/kartierung/k...
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
It probably does, yeah. I'll just have to do some research on all the suggestions. Mind you, I'm not looking for a good translation, but rather wondering whether the idea of "smaller fields as diversity and specialized knowledge" exists in the first place.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Boutique is something Chat GPT comes up with. Never heard of it. 🤷
bsky.app/profile/jele...
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Sorry if I cannot make myself clear enough. I'm not looking for a way to describe a small field. This is not about a literal translation, but whether a concept or an idea exists in different contexts. Perhaps this was a good way to put it:
bsky.app/profile/juli...
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
In other words, I'm looking for a term that doesn't only designate the size or developmental status of fields, but also carries the - generalized - idea of diversity and specialization that is valuable per se.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
True - IF there is no policy effort based on the idea to preserve "minor fields" for the sake of diversity and specialized knowledge. This is precisely what the German term implies. I was wondering whether this notion - small fields are a thing that should be protected - exists in other contexts.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Kind of. If I remember correctly I had a Polish speaking colleague reading the paper and they assured me that the translation wasn't far off. But that was it. 🤷
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Yeah, I guess I'll just google micro-, niche-, narrow-, focused-, minor-, and proto-, and see what comes up.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The latter, in my non-Polish speaking case. 😬
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Thank you! This indeed sounds like an established term. But doesn't it designate "fields that are not yet disciplines but might become one", i.e., doesn't it have a developmental implication?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I know! I could swear I've read about it, perhaps in the context of the @britishacademy.bsky.social.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Niche what, though? Fields? Disciplines? Mind you, I'm not looking for a way to describe fields that happen to be niche, but for an established term, a category that says that "niche fields" are a thing.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Would you consider any of the above an established term suggesting, say, "niche fields" to be a thing per se? Similar to, e.g., "basic research" designating more that just "research that happens to be basic".
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Indeed a good starting point, thanks!
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
English speaking colleagues, I need your help: Is there an English word for particularly small disciplines? An umbrella term for fields like sinology, frisian studies, paleontology, etc.? In Germany, small fields are a thing ("kleine Fächer" or "Orchideenfächer"). Is there an English equivalent?
18 replies
8 reposts
21 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Finally, my new article was published, where I try to combine my previous research with my new project on the history of normality:
Normalizing capitalism: East Germans experiencing the market economy during the 1990s, in: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe
doi.org/10.1080/2573...
0 replies
4 reposts
6 likes
Humboldt-Universität Berlin suspends professor after allegations of sexualized violence:
www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/nach-...
0 replies
8 reposts
16 likes
So happy for you! Congratulations!
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
So weit würde ich nicht gehen. ;) Aber zumindest erscheinen aktuelle Strukturen nicht mehr alternativlos und es wird klar, dass es auch anders funktionieren kann. Das allein ist schon so wichtig!
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
An unserem Institut diskutieren wir gerade über die Einführung von Departmentstrukturen - völlig ergebnisoffen und durchaus kritisch, aber ein wichtiger Austausch. Inkl. Inputs von bestehenden Departments an der HU, z.B. @rosefeldt.bsky.social und zu Rahmenbedingungen der Unileitung (hier vom VPH).
0 replies
6 reposts
24 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Eingefrorene Flirts: Für die Soziale Welt haben @thorstenpeetz.bsky.social und ich Spiegelselfies auf Datingplattformen ikonisch interpretiert.
www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0038...
1 replies
6 reposts
19 likes
Good Sociology and the Future Organization of Social Research: @chdaye.bsky.social's review of new books by Gabriel Abend and @dromishai.bsky.social & Samuel Stabler is insightful and well worth a read:
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...
1 replies
2 reposts
6 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Hey #skystorians and other academics, what are your experiences with the costs of OA ("gold")? I'm once again trapped between funder and publisher, arguing for wildly different costs for a monograph (70k words). I'm talking 7.500 € on one side and 14.000 € on the other.
1 replies
4 reposts
9 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
⚠️ SRM Special Issue "Learning Through Failures": Updated Timeline
NEW (optional):
❓ 01 Sep: Submission of extended abstracts (500-1000 words) for pre-screening to failures_srm@wzb.eu
🗣️ 13 Sep: Feedback from eds @llhipp.bsky.social & @sewenz.bsky.social
CfP: ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/...
0 replies
6 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Economics held itself above other disciplines + retained influence on gov policy. This article clearly & honestly self-appraises this problem. Namely its source: the treatment of mathematical models as 'truth', as if by magic. www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/...
2 replies
2 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Martin Kusch of Vienna and I are editing a special issue of Studies in HPS entitled "Are Social Sciences Special?". We are interested in both history and philosophy essays, see the link for the framing and instructions for how to submit. Deadline is Sept 30th 2024 #philsci #histsci #philsky #STS
1 replies
49 reposts
70 likes
Super, dass es bei Dir geholfen hat. Das macht Mut für meine Sehne im Fuß. Notorisch langwierige Angelegenheit, deswegen jetzt Stoßwellen zusätzlich zur Physio.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Genau meine Nische: Ich war eben bei meiner ersten Stoßwellenbehandlung und habe davor Druckfahnen für ein Paper zu Meritokratie abgeschickt.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Stip: Thyssen@KWI Fellowship
www.hsozkult.de/grant/id/stip-144787
Essen, 01.04.2025-30.09.2025, Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities, Bewerbungsschluss: 13.09.2024
0 replies
3 reposts
3 likes
Damit ist die Sache für mich vom Tisch.
www.netzwerk-wissenschaftsfreiheit.de/wissenschaft...
1 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
👀
0 replies
2 reposts
5 likes
Ein Aspekt des BMBF-Debakels betrifft auch das Begutachtungswesen: Bei zukünftigen Begutachtungsanfragen durchs BMBF werde zumindest ich sehr genau darüber nachdenken, ob ich durch meine Expertise zur wissenschaftlichen Legitimation einer so offenkundig politisierten Förderpraxis beitragen will.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Why & how do scholars study rankings?
I've puzzled over this question and wrote a short piece, in which I try to make sense of divergent literatures.
The boundary problem between #rankings research and practice is smth I'd like to explore more in the future.
Preprint here: osf.io/preprints/os...
0 replies
7 reposts
8 likes
Reposted by Julian Hamann
Unsere Stellungnahme zur BMBF-Intervention Wissenschaftsfreiheit! netzwerk-nachhaltige-wissenschaft.de/wp-content/u...
0 replies
32 reposts
57 likes