|
Popehat@kenwhite.bsky.social |
Yes, I didn’t consider the ludicrous possibility he could appeal because angry tweets are official acts. My vestigial connection to humanity occasionally impairs my ability to predict FedSoc arguments.
7 replies 24 reposts 399 likes
|
Michael Lobel
@mlobelart.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Serious question from a longtime follower: Do you think any of the conservative justices who signed on to this decision are regretting it at all right now?
11 replies 0 reposts 32 likes
|
Portland Man
@erikgunderson.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Same
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
_borntobemild
@born2bemild.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"Covfefe" is out then.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Noah Nelson 💥
@noahjnelson.com
[ View ] |
It’s like the worst kids in the debate club have seized the reigns of power.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
David Noll
@david.noll.org
[ View ] |
Maybe there's something to the demands that law schools hire more MAGA professors. Half of lawyering is understanding the plasticity of law and normal people just can't grok the stupid shit that will get traction these days.
0 replies 0 reposts 26 likes
|
John Doyle
@jdoyleoss.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The 2nd Circuit has a ruling in this area already, naturally Trump related. So presumed immunity?
www.npr.org/2019/07/09/7...
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
SlobberHog
@banjofiend.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Tweets are official communication but they are also public knowledge. It’s not like a private conversation with a staffer. How can tweets be withheld as evidence in that case since theoretically anyone can go look at them?
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes