"President Biden, who seemed fully conscious and did not drool on himself, warned that an asteroid would wipe out all life in three days. Though he's been long dogged by questions about his physical and mental stamina, the president remained upright as he briefed the nation on the coming apocalypse"
God damned fucking evil bastards, and this coming on the heels of SC rulings. But with his newly appointed official powers, maybe just maybe Biden will set up the guillotines if he is all still there in the current moment?
lol, I’ll kinda take it, tho? The best way out of this crisis is to elect a ton of Dems, and if Biden’s age is an obstacle to that, I’ll take the NYT pointing out every time it isn’t an issue?
How long before Trump throws the entire NYT editorial staff in prison for not reporting how he’s the most brilliant and handsome President-for-life we’ve ever been so lucky to have?
Look here. The NYT is being ridiculous but let's not let Joe Biden off the hook for sh*tting the bed when the stakes were high. It's on him that he gave his detractors so much grist for the mill. I'm tired of carrying that old man's water. I'm voting for him but I honestly wish I didn't have to.
Disable communications
Install minions
Take over news outlets
Fire journalists
Silence intellectuals
Remove consequences, barriers, and restraints
What am I missing?
Kevin as a historian would you rank “presidents can do crime” ruling as one of the top 5 big days in US history? To me this seems up there w Declaration of Independence and ratification of constitution. Dwarfs stock crash, Pearl Harbor and 9-11
Biden brazenly flaunted the Hatch Act in a meta game of “Fuck-you-and-the-horse-you-rode-in-on-while-I-count-the-seconds-until-you-get-in-a-lather-over-my-breaking-of-the-Hatch-Act.”
As a historian, how do you make sure there is enough record for future historians to know that even though the "paper of record" said that, many many people thought they were on crack?