|
Andrew Fleischman@nobodyinteresting.bsky.social |
There were no laws against fully automatic weapons at the time of the Founding.
7 replies 3 reposts 36 likes
|
PeoriaBummer
@peoriabummer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Without the 13th-15th Amendments, what would these “traditions” imply? 🤔
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Staid Winnow
@staidwinnow.bsky.social
[ View ] |
“The Constitution does not ban bump stocks, consequently banning them is unconstitutional.” ~ Jonathan Turdley, probably.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Nancy Gage
@ngage.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Just goes to prove.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Tom
@alttag.bsky.social
[ View ] |
This is also the reason we also don’t have laws enforcing Internet privacy.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Lukas Bradley
@lukasbradley.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Or possession of enriched uranium.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
Ashton
@ashtonk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Only a matter of time until they try and repeal the NFA via judge.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@jiminnh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I suppose that if one were a true "originalist," one might conclude therefore that under Article 1, Section 8 the Supreme Court had no business opining on the relationship between the other two branches about such things. (I know this is a silly, convoluted argument but that's kinda' the point)
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes