|
Philip Bump@pbump.com |
The immunity decision was upside down, fretting about the indictment of Trump as a harbinger of future threats to the presidency instead of recognizing Trump's actions as a past and current one.
Gift link: wapo.st/4bquy5M
9 replies 44 reposts 179 likes
|
Academic Family Doc
@dogsandcoffee.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So basically, Nixon was just a man ahead of his time
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
@la-crystal.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Honestly think they weren't thinking first and foremost what this meant for Trump? I honestly don't believe they were focused on the future no matter what they claim.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@progressivepeter.bsky.social
[ View ] |
EXACTLY! SCOTUS tried to hit it out of the ballpark, but basically said "maybe yes, maybe no. Crimes no - but hey, appeal if you want to commit them anyways." We've always had this level of presidential immunity: *nothing* changed. SCOTUS should not have taken the request for such a habby outcome.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
John Forsyth
@jhfhockey.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Since he's immune, Biden should order Seal Team Six to execute Sniffles. It's an official act upholding his oath to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Doremi Fasolatido
@stanubeki.bsky.social
[ View ] |
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Are You Being Detained
@sailbarque.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Hmm. It is weird that this particular court didn't see it that way.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
@cateatdog.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Well this changes The Pelican Brief.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
KC Momkin
@kc-momkin.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Can the Senate or the DOJ do anything about the fact that Thomas and Alito did not recuse? It would still be 4-3, but Barrett's position would be the compromise.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes