Reposted by Felix Ling
RepresentUs and Unusual Whales are asking their fellow Americans to make their voices heard at represent.us/unusualwhales where they can tell Congress to pass the ETHICS Act. #PeopleNotPortfolios #Politics #USPolitics #Congress #StockTrading #BanStockTrading #EthicsAct
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
"Houston is joining dozens of American cities and counties... experimenting with guaranteed-income programs amid growing wealth inequality in the U.S."
www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
For anybody not in those two groups, consider supporting
- Braver Angels (braverangels.org)
- Millions of Conversations (www.millionsofconversations.com)
- orgs like Fix Our House (fixourhouse.org) that support Proportional Representation
protectdemocracy.org/work/proport...
Sales spiel over.
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
I understand that not everybody views polarization as a bad thing. As I see it, there are two main groups that prefer polarization.
1) The Democratic and Republican Parties (anger drives up voter turnout).
2) Social media companies (anger drives up engagement).
And also anybody who supports them.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I can't decide what was the most polarizing thing said on this thread:
1) Your blaming my attitude (i.e., framing everything positively) for driving country's polarization just now
2) You accusing me of supporting imperialism and white supremacy (bsky.app/profile/reco...).
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Well, if you prefer, I can hunt down your quotes and explain how I interpreted them.
But you'll have to wait until Monday. This is a day off for me, and I'm about to go outside and get some exercise and sunshine before the rain arrives tomorrow. Take care!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yes, and what I'm choosing to "sell" are methods, organizations, and institutional reforms that I think will reduce political polarization.
Do you agree that polarization is reaching dangerous highs right now? If so, what I'm "selling" should be useful.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
As I interpreted what you've said, you broadly agree with those three points.
If my interpretation was wrong, this is a good opportunity to clarify how you disagree with them.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Yes, and in my experience, I have found that framing everything positively is a good technique for overcoming this polarizing fear of difference.
What techniques have you found useful in combating polarization? Have you heard of Braver Angels?
braverangels.org
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Do you agree or disagree on the three main points I've raised in this thread?
1) racism is wrong
2) the two-party system (including the Democratic Party) has not helped address it
3) political messages tailored to their target audience are more effective than those that are not
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I don't fear negativity. I just see positivity as more productive -- especially when political polarization is so high.
www.pewresearch.org/politics/202...
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I saw my activity as supporting the idea that we agree on the important things.
And not enough people do that on social media. There are just way too many people quibbling about the unimportant things.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Nobody who supports UBI believes that. As I see it, capitalism only requires the assumptions that
1) people respond to incentives
2) central planning is inefficient
Note that a free market plus a Universal Basic Income still works under those assumptions.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
And if this place is little more than a Gab or Parler for the left, then the value add of this community to my overall experience is not as high as that of Threads, Twitter, or even Reddit.
My more argumentative younger self enjoyed bursting bubbles, but my opportunity costs now are too high.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
My guess (given complaints I've heard from others) is that this is not caused by my approach, but because the people here have become comfortable dealing largely only with likeminded people.
The behaviors are very akin to "circling the wagons" I often see in ideologically homogenous communities.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
What works for me on Twitter is to simply have a friendly attitude and frame everything positively/constructively. That generally results in positive exchanges with people of any ideology (unless they are a paid troll).
I have yet to discover what -- if anything -- works similarly here.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
When it comes to values, beliefs, and principles, I think it's more helpful to view conversations as a chance to share and enrich each other with perspectives we may not have encountered before to avoid bubbles and echo chambers.
Trying to prove/disprove such things is unnecessarily combative.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
These posts make a claim about what *I* believe that were inaccurate (see the replies to them).
I think a conversation is more productive when people share about themselves (e.g., their values/beliefs), rather than what they think about others -- especially negative things, which can be offputting.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
One is about morals (poor people need to be uplifted), the other is purely about economic efficiency and welfare (a country should use free-market capitalism instead of socialism).
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Regarding the charge of "socialism." Socialism centralizes the economic decision-making to the government (i.e., central planning).
UBI actually *decentralizes* economic decision-making to all of us individuals. It allows free-market capitalism to work the way it really ought to work.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
"Houston is joining dozens of American cities and counties... that are experimenting with [UBI].... They reflect a growing sentiment... that distributing money without strings is one of the most effective and least bureaucratic ways to help struggling Americans."
www.wsj.com/politics/pol...
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
For the most part, the Founding Fathers hated political parties.
I see political parties as inevitable due to economies of scale. They are also invaluable means by which complex policy issues can be translated into simpler labels that voters can more readily understand.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
That being said, my Libertarianism derives less from property rights and more from Lord Acton's observation that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
I am perhaps unusual in seeing this as applying both to government power as well as economic power and thus seek to limit both.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
It can also derive from the belief that economies are more efficient and productive when people are provided with incentives to earn their rewards instead of being gifted them or stealing them.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
bsky.app/profile/reco...
bsky.app/profile/reco...
bsky.app/profile/reco...
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes