Peter Sagal's avatar

Peter Sagal

@petersagal.bsky.social

Trump’s lawyer made that explicit argument this AM to @steveinskeep.bsky.social, citing the court decisions that held his social media feeds are official communications so he couldn’t block people, hah hah hah.

7 replies 9 reposts 159 likes


Popehat's avatar Popehat @kenwhite.bsky.social
[ View ]

Yes, I didn’t consider the ludicrous possibility he could appeal because angry tweets are official acts. My vestigial connection to humanity occasionally impairs my ability to predict FedSoc arguments.

7 replies 24 reposts 399 likes


Daniel Martin's avatar Daniel Martin @fizbin.bsky.social
[ View ]

Though I thought that the recent USSC decision said that the public record of official acts *could* be cited. So, no citing internal communications with comms staffers workshoping potential tweets, but actual public tweets should be admissible.

1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes


New and improved jedgeco's avatar New and improved jedgeco @jedgeco.bsky.social
[ View ]

My one consolation in all of this is that the contemptable lawyers representing Trump are having their July 4th plans ruined.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Lighting Rod  [Bluesky Older]'s avatar Lighting Rod [Bluesky Older] @yendorcire.bsky.social
[ View ]

not everything a person says is a public act. He did make public pronouncements on Twitter and if he blocked people, they would miss those. He wants to pretend everything he does is official and above reproach and it looks like the Supreme Court will back him on that.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Rob Honeycutt 's avatar Rob Honeycutt @robhon.bsky.social
[ View ]

I heard that interview this morning and could only think to myself, “Hey, isn’t this the ongoing argument from these guys? You can’t get him here for this, but there are these other means to hold him accountable.” Then they just turn around and slam the other door shut.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Kai's avatar Kai @kaikronfield.bsky.social
[ View ]

That's when I turned off my radio. I can't listen to his defense team gloat. I'm still too angry.

0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes


Chiles's avatar Chiles @chiles101.bsky.social
[ View ]

I always thought a basic tenet of law in most countries was that changes in the law can not be retroactive. TFG was found guilty before SCOTUS ruling...?

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes