I simultaneously feel like Biden should probably not be the Democratic nominee and also that parts of the media seem weirdly gleeful about it in a way that completely ignores the consequences of electing Trump again
2 replies
13 reposts
50 likes
That’s from her WaPo bio.
Her path is very reminiscent of Haberman’s, or Patrick Healy’s:
Republican source-building, bounce around; back to bothsides Politics reporting.
For shame, WaPo execs and editors. You want this; you select for it.
0 replies
1 reposts
15 likes
What an utterly typical path she has in our broken political journalism world.
Story about RBG’s trainer, a slew of stories requiring a Republican source network: taking side of Fox, McCain (R) and Schwartznegger (R).
Then back to SCOTUS… which she treats as if there are no stakes.
2/3
1 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
That’s from her WaPo bio.
Her path is very reminiscent of Haberman’s, or Patrick Healy’s:
Republican source-building, fluff, back to bothsides Politics reporting.
For shame, WaPo execs and editors. You want this; you select for it.
0 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
Ann Marimow is one of the worst political journalists in America today.
The most important beat since the Civil War dropped in her lap, and she’s taking the side of Jefferson Davis.
2 replies
10 reposts
35 likes
Ha this is great! I was making a list yesterday too of parts of the Constitution the Roberts Taney II Court had rewritten.
@ryanlcooper.com and I on the same wavelength.
Happy Fourth! Go, fight, let’s win in Nov.
3 replies
13 reposts
36 likes
Reposted by Eric Blair
It is so funny everyone is indexing on the Stephanopoulos interview.
The Earl Ingram interview from today drops tomorrow morning. And Ingram was just this morning, pre-interview dropping "tough talk" that Biden prob doesn't have what it takes. civicmedia.us/shows/earl-i...
bsky.app/profile/mosh...
6 replies
7 reposts
29 likes
This is why I am focusing on the need for Court reform. That one is very clear!
1 replies
0 reposts
11 likes
It’s the origin story of NYT v. Sullivan in fact
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
AIPAC poll?
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Biden digital team >>> rest of Biden media/comms strategists
(Start posting on Bluesky too, Megan Coyne!)
1 replies
6 reposts
27 likes
No nationwide injuction, just applicable to parties in the case. But lots of arguments here that are ripe for a Trump judge nationwide injunction. Interesting that this Trump-appointed judge declined to do that.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Article III just rewrote Article II is part of the problem. And yes!
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
The corrupt SCOTUS just took away your noncompete ban.
3 replies
9 reposts
27 likes
Sure but they intend that to not matter.
By that time, unless we stop them, the Court will have already imposed fascism. They're doing everything they can to break Congress and put power in the president and the courts
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
The Roberts Court already rewrote the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 10th, 14th, and 24th Amendments, and no one imposed consequences.
So they might as well rewrite Article II, right?
1 replies
6 reposts
17 likes
This is true and Harlan Crow and Charles Koch are smart enough to know they don’t really need more justices on SCOTUS. They have what they need.
What they now aim for is a full authoritarian coup.
That’s why billionaires put $100M into Project 2025.
We are already in the crisis.
5 replies
61 reposts
214 likes
I admit to being an insufferable dork
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
And I'm correct af
check out the thread
2 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Ok, sorry: that was too snarky.
I really do think the main critique is about media structure and not about this particular issue; it's about what the NYT does NOT cover or does not say, as much as what it does.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
It completely does answer your question, and if you don't understand my structural critique and think instead it's only about this single issue, then you won't understand why our media is broken.
(The Wire is a good popular start to distinguish structural from specific critique)
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
right, if that is true (and it probably is) you're saying that the NYT is a conservative-biased paper, for audience reasons. So that's fine, but most of the country does not know that
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Eric Blair
“When they don't take a side, that's a choice.”
That, for me, is the whole lesson. They can call on Biden to resign, sure. But then they’re admitting that the whole neutrality thing was bullshit all along.
0 replies
3 reposts
7 likes
they didn't lead with sources like this in other cases.
Their choice of what to lead with and how to cover it is a huge source of bias, and they deny that's true
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Whatever you think about Biden,
look at the New York Times.
They are unabashedly cheerleading for him to drop out.
We should never again think of the Times as a liberal or even a neutral paper. The NYT takes sides when they want to. When they don't take a side, that's a choice.
6 replies
15 reposts
75 likes
"All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen perpetuate and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war"
That interest today is Christian theocratic oligarchy
www.nps.gov/linc/learn/h...
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
and a lot of bad shit has happened in America in the past 8 years.
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
We know Netanyahu funneled money to Hamas through Qatar.
Also, a Qatari oligarch helped Musk buy Twitter.
And Musk and Kushner spent the World Cup Finals in the box of the Qatari Prime Minister.
The US gov't better be ready to stop foreign interference in the Nov elections.
2 replies
10 reposts
15 likes
According to this today in JPost, Netanyahu was offered money from #Qatar for several years. The Qatari docs allegedly say $50 million was transferred.
No evidence provided from Netanyahu side.
www.jpost.com/israel-news/...
0 replies
3 reposts
7 likes
Reposted by Eric Blair
These guys are traitors to the republic just like their heroes Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee
10 replies
106 reposts
727 likes
The most important thing that happened in America over the past 8 years is the corrupt Court declaring the end of the American Republic — that the next Republican president will be a king.
2 replies
5 reposts
20 likes
Yes. Big.
Who was the McKinsey client here - or if not disclosed, who are the major clients for McKinsey in the automotive/gov't space, and what do they want?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes