Reposted by Keith
when you are a times alum on this website
1 replies
5 reposts
29 likes
RIP to those others who claimed Harrenhal and were befell by its curse, but I'm built different.
0 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
evergreen
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
There's something almost impressive about the modern American homeostasis. Coalitions, policies, politics are all moving at rapid speeds at the moment, the ground constantly shifting. And yet federal control remains a competitive knife-edge. It's hard to say which is tail and which is dog.
1 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
that is... an extremely polite description of them, all things told.
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
Oh, is this an issue you care about? Then I've got a presidential candidate for you!
It's such a shame you can't read the article or even this skeet.
woay.com/biden-admini...
2 replies
0 reposts
10 likes
Yes, when people say "Biden cannot win", I don't know what polls they are looking at. The standard appears not to be merely a candidate that could win, but one who polls so well it does not feel like Trump could win.
I don't think that candidate exists this cycle, and when she did, polls were wrong
1 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
I think she was mostly trying to judo the point to be about Trump's fitness.
But also, apparently Biden hadn't called her or Jeffries until today, so she'd only been hearing from a donor class that was getting rattled by Sulzberger's ratfuck campaign.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Whatever that weird episode was, a lid seems to have been affixed now.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Why won't that happen this time, too?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Why didn't Dems losing in 2016 lead to this muscular 3rd party you predict?
1 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
How did that work out in 2016?
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
You've got a few of the Blue Dogs now, helpfully proving why they are an almost extinct political species.
1 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
That's fair. Things ain't pretty on that score.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
oh, yes, they are papercuts at best. I did mean to imply the media is truly drawing blood right now, just that they are easily entertained by witnessing even the smallest drop of red stuff when it comes to this topic. Getting even on backbenching rep spooked can sustain them for a week.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
If Trump loses, they won't have any power. No control over executive, unlikely to win the legislature, and even if they did, it wouldn't be by enough to overcome a veto.
They'll still be dangerous fascisct shitweasels, but they'll be iced out of commanding men with guns for another 4 years.
2 replies
0 reposts
14 likes
This is probably not the last "Biden old" news cycle. But they do eventually get bored, even if it's like a week later than they should stop. They eventually got bored of it after the Hur report.
They're drawing blood with Dem defections right now, so it'll be a while yet though.
1 replies
0 reposts
13 likes
Come with me in my time machine to 4 years ago
www.google.com/search?q=bid...
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Very fun to read this 2019 opinion piece. We might actually be trapped in Hell.
www.foxnews.com/opinion/lesl...
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
It's not obvious to me? "detoriate" implies he always hasn't been like this. This is from a 2019 story.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Is that headline written from a timeline where "post debate conventional wisdom" is not "lol, debates don't matter"?
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Keith
I say this while assiduously trying not to cast aspersions on any person or outlet in particular
but
if you beat a particular drum for months; see a particular event as vindication for doing so; write piles of panicky copy as a result; then see polling contradict you...
... maybe take a knee?
12 replies
36 reposts
256 likes
Fitzgerald v. Nixon gave us presidential civil immunity. Clinton v Jone pared it back.
It's too soon, but, the path is clear in the future for how to start undoing Trump v US: a Democratic president is gonna have to do some crimes (jaywalking or something)
1 replies
2 reposts
14 likes
Wait, @merovingians.bsky.social, what'd you get got for posting on the Cybertruck Owner's Forum?
I mean, given yesterday's news, I can hazard guesses.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
That's untrue!
Sometimes it's Chris Rufo
0 replies
0 reposts
12 likes
Or a more recent racist, sexist example
0 replies
0 reposts
20 likes
Yes, it will come back as 2029, but there is no candidate that stops republicans from existing.
If you want to extinguish the republican party and the millions of americans that keep voting for them, you don't want a candidate in an election, you want a gun in a civil war.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
2025 turns on having presidential power. If they could do it now while out of office, it'd be project 2024.
Just getting the ham sandwich elected will prevent 2025.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
In lieu of a trial, I'm not sure this is actually a bad thing, politics wise.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I guess it's both. Grey Lady was rumormongering first, but Politico had the big splash piece that was "proof"
thehill.com/opinion/whit...
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The FT piece that people are linking alongside the latest NYT piece to beat the "Bidens gotta go" drums:
archive.is/a6wKB
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Oh yeah, this media upset at Biden being old is going to go so much softer on a female candidate.
1 replies
0 reposts
20 likes