Reposted by Two all the way, a coffee milk, and a Del's
You had me at “exceedingly dry in-jokes for recherché subcultures”
37 replies
945 reposts
3114 likes
But they were and are free to give softballs to one and heaters to the other.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
There was never any such thing as “equal time/same questions rules”.
The only “equal time” provision was and is that over the air radio and TV stations (and only OTA stations) have to provide equivalent access to competing political candidates.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
For me Twin Peaks season 3 episode 8 is a very strong contender.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Quite possibly Twin Peaks S3E8.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I'm sure it was! :(. (That was a horrific read.)
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Though by choosing to marry Aragorn it'd be tough either way. Either she did what she did or else she chooses to be reckoned Eldar and while she can be with her elven family she is separated from Aragorn (and maybe her kids depending what they choose?) until the end of time.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I think you mean how *Scarlett* was induced to the sign the NDA?
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Extra sad since she will be separated from all her family (other than Aragorn and kids) until literally the end of time.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Right. Frodo has the Gift of Illuvatar and is not bound to the circles of the world. He'll have some healing in Valinor and then will die and end up with the same fate as all mortals.
And that last will happen to Arwen too, as like Elros she chose to be reckoned human.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Kinda tangential, but I only happened upon your readthru + commenting on TLotR practically at the very end :( and now I'm sad about what all I've missed. Is there any easy way to find all your LotR posts on bsky or do I need to scroll wayyy back on your timeline (how far back?) and manually search?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Crew length socks here at age 6, crew length socks here at age 56.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
The other tell is they will virtually never respond to a direct “please tell us what you believe the FD explicitly did” question.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I’ll give FD truthers one thing — they’re not as dumb as 9/11 truthers.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
No, it didn’t. The FD was, in fact, fairly explicitly NOT about news.
It was about *opinion*. It said an opportunity had to be made available to present an alternate opinion. Which could be and often was something like a 2 min op-ed after the end of the 11pm local news that almost nobody watched.
2 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Why don’t you tell us, explicitly, with no handwavey vague weasel words, precisely what you believe the FD.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
1) they are cable channels which the FD would have been constitutionally-barred from applying to.
2) even if it did apply to them the FD wouldn’t have prevented them from operating like they do.
Just what do you believe the FD did, anyways?
3 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
*lived, even. 🤣
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
And there are plenty of states that don’t ask for ID. I’ve personally loved in two of them.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Yeah. Khan’s now a kid in our time rather than the Eugenics wars happening in the 1990s.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Not to mention the many things that are "lies" but not lies.
Like when a Tucker Carlson says that 10s or even 100s of thousands of people have died within a couple of days of getting a covid vaccine.
Misleading as that is, it's actually quite true. (There's no causation of course, but it's true!)
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Yes, they sometimes do. Big time. On sexual assault related things even. Apparently you missed the huge debacle of their fake article on an alleged rape at UVirginia, for example.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Sadly this sort of "we're not going to make it clear we're merely reporting someone else's reporting" thing is de rigueur in American media.
2 replies
1 reposts
15 likes
We were a serious country once.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
A constitutional convention is only an alternative way to *propose* amendments. You still need 3/4 of states to ratify anything that comes out of it.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
I mean evil, black, matched swords that help but ultimately repeatedly screw over their wielders and that talks to the final wielder at the end?
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I was amused by the irony that, given how much Moorcock hates Tolkien, ol' JRR pre-figured Stormbringer a bit (though not by publication date, of course).
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Two all the way, a coffee milk, and a Del's
not sure why there's an expectation that you treat chapo trap house any differently than alex jones just because their sandy hook is in syria
6 replies
34 reposts
216 likes
Engage some reading comprehension. CA is going to go for the Dem no matter who, making them completely irrelevant to whether or not Biden should stay in. Same for MA, NY, etc. Likewise lots of states are going for Trump no matter who the Dem is so they are also irrelevant to the Biden question.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes