It’s cool how this story started with anti-vax mass murderer Alex Berenson and was then published in the Times and definitely no one should take a moment to reflect on what it means that we’re doing that now
0 replies
1 reposts
69 likes
Once it became clear Biden wasn’t going to step down - pretty unsurprising the president wouldn’t leave after bombing a debate - there wasn’t any good path that didn’t involve shooting him full of holes, so that’s kinda that
1 replies
0 reposts
29 likes
The thing for me is that I genuinely want Trump to lose extremely badly so I’m extremely reluctant to shoot anyone who could plausibly be on ballot opposite him full of holes under any circumstances, even if doing so might in some scenarios result in him having a stronger opponent
1 replies
0 reposts
30 likes
oh my god it’s the smoking gun, proving that the times only believes it has agency over Democrats, so much so that it has mistaken the November election for a Democratic primary where voters choose the most electable candidate
0 replies
12 reposts
102 likes
Reposted by Will Stancil
Is Joe Biden the opinion editor—or news editor—of the New York Times? Why does Biden have to do anything to put all the extremely newsworthy facts in this paragraph into heavy rotation at the top of the homepage? Why say "of course" Trump should drop out when you haven't written that he should?
18 replies
46 reposts
287 likes
I don’t even mind that people raised the possibility, sounded it out, etc. But acting like it was a foregone conclusion is so reckless!!
2 replies
1 reposts
62 likes
People felt VERY free to tear chunks off Biden because they figured he was cooked. But driving out a president is a big deal, and now they’ve just potentially mortally wounded him while failing
11 replies
17 reposts
153 likes
I feel like some people just substantially underestimated the difficulty of jettisoning a sitting president and burned a lot of pretty important bridges based on that faulty assumption
8 replies
24 reposts
212 likes
Yes, it’s fine to be worried about the debate, it’s fine to wish we had another nominee, it’s fine to think about how to make it happen. But the fixation on replacing has become a rationale for waging open war on DEMOCRATS, which over time is doing considerably more damage than the debate did
6 replies
31 reposts
147 likes
Even outside the extremely overheated rhetoric about Biden’s supposed infirmity, his opponent is DONALD TRUMP, who shares every deficiency of Biden’s and many more! Stop assuming that we lose because we don’t nominate the platonic ideal of a candidate!
6 replies
11 reposts
67 likes
It’s really hard to say the juice is worth the squeeze when “the squeeze” is “steamrolling over huge parts of your own party’s base and making clear their voices are irrelevant and unwanted” and the juice is “Kamala Harris”
2 replies
1 reposts
26 likes
What the media talkers never understood was that the entire reason this anti-Biden crusade was a hellaciously bad idea wasn’t because it’s impossible to theorize a better ticket (it’s easy) but because presidents have supporters and the only way to replace one is war with your own party
3 replies
6 reposts
49 likes
Also, I’m amazed by the media types who are currently openly trying to push out a sitting president - something that has happened once in history, in a historic scandal - and are mad that lots of people are angry and upset. It’s like “Oh right you think you’re supposed to just dictate events to us”
3 replies
11 reposts
76 likes
I feel like we may come to regret such a thing! Just a hunch!
3 replies
0 reposts
34 likes
I mean is it possible that the most progressive president of my lifetime had a single bad debate night and now bunch of unelected chatterers are going to attack him until he drops out, overruling the normal democratic process
4 replies
8 reposts
65 likes
has Biden actually done anything after the debate that was disqualifying or is the building crisis entirely a bunch of media figures who took an extreme view and now need to force Biden out or eat crow, and have decided the best way to do that is destroy him electorally
9 replies
7 reposts
84 likes
Same stuff, but his followers kept making the threat explicit and he’d reply to me pointing that out by just reiterating the countdown. So I dunno, felt pretty clear to me what the meaning was
4 replies
1 reposts
27 likes