Reposted by Geoff Johnson
I do the same for Utah Abortion Fund. You can too!
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
I think a huge factor is that Harris would *all of the sudden have to begin running for president*, which seems like a pretty big time commitment when you’re practically starting from zero. Kinda better if she’s not also figuring out being president at that same time. (Also all of this sucks!)
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Donating to abortion funds like Palmetto State is one of the more meaningful forms of financial support we can offer in this moment. I’m kicking in a small monthly amount and encourage those who can to do the same (or just to amplify this call for funding). These groups need grassroots support!
1 replies
20 reposts
22 likes
That's fucking absurd. Canceling Disney Plus now. Kids will be crushed but I have ethics and aesthetics.
0 replies
0 reposts
13 likes
Literally eaten by hyenas. Probably not a fun way to go—especially with all the laughing while chewing. Disney went all in on that one.
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
This sounds about right, but I think with some solid radical political education and a collective “hey now! let’s think for just one minute there before we post!” promise we can whip this crew into fighting shape.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This is a hilarious and perfectly apt analogy. Well done.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
It's nuts. "Permission to use AI on essays" is like "permission to use an app to do every math problem." It potentially short circuits basically all real learning. New tech changes how we teach, but AI was not designed as an education tool and there's been no meaningful discussion about its use.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I teach at a CUNY school, so we're probably experiencing the same problem! I think most faculty were so blindsided by the applications of generative AI--and mainly just trying to figure out the sudden impact on instruction--that we haven't been able to push back effectively. And admins won't do it.
2 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I definitely see the usefulness--mainly in areas I don't know about--and am sure could find some useful applications (though for now I'd rather stay away from the whole endeavor because it's gross/has a nasty effect on decarbonization). But the lack of pushback from the education sector isn't great!
3 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
of the past *but also the present*--essentially poisoning future archives, in a sense--is appalling.
I'm curious to know if serious conversations about the harms of AI are happening at other academic institutions, rather than the blithe acceptance of its inevitability that I've seen so far. 🗃️
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
on the wrong side, perhaps because they see tech money flowing their way if they get on board with AI. I honestly don't know what the deal is, but we need to be talking about it a lot more. As a history teacher, the idea that this mindless generative AI is already bending popular understandings... 🗃️
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
I want to do. It's antithetical to most of my pedagogical practices, since in my classes I want us to be reading, discussing, and writing--with our own brains. Why should I incorporate some tech bros' get-rich-quick-bot into my class? It's nuts and admins in higher ed are, predictably, largely... 🗃️
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
find any panel where the premise was, "hey--why in the hell would we use this crap? Do we, particularly those of us who teach in the humanities, want this at all?" I teach reading and writing skills for pre-matric students and US history. Generative AI is a curse not a gift for most of what... 🗃️
1 replies
3 reposts
12 likes
I remain appalled that higher ed has largely embraced AI, or at best not taken much of a stance. The public university where I teach held a huge IT conference (with industry peeps) in the last academic year where essentially every panel was devoted to how to use AI in our classes. I did not... 🗃️
5 replies
14 reposts
37 likes
The current leadership of the Democratic Party can for sure find a way, but we should try to prevent them pursuing such a path.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I think the idea here is to terrify people into voting and/or other action. Maybe that works for some, but I don’t think saying “we’ll all pretty much die if we lose” is good organizing strategy. Instead set goals that will carry on past Nov and talk about how we’ll keep fighting/protect each other.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I understand why people say things like this—it’s quite common rhetoric—and Trump II is a horrifying prospect. But referring to one electoral loss, no matter how bad, as “the end” of elections, any vague sort of democracy, etc. is defeatist and false. The fight goes on after November either way. 1/2
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Exactly. “Fending off authoritarian regime” is a good rallying cry—but how? SCOTUS is already an authoritarian power. Now what? What does a Dem President do with 4 more years? What laws will they be pushing if voters deliver both houses for the Dems? Tell us specific goals and let’s fight for them!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Yeah, I’m not sure if there were will be polls that could answer my question or not. It’s just something I’m wondering about, that is the extent to which core Democratic voters at this exact moment would like to switch out of Biden or not. The answer to that is a factor in terms of electoral energy.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Whether it’s Biden or Harris, because it is definitely one of those two, the key is to run the campaign in a way that activates a ton more people that are not activated now. Give us specific things to rally around—and by “us” I mean all potential Democratic voters/activists. “Not Trump” doesn’t win.
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Right, but that poll didn't ask the question I asked and anyway is already quite outdated given the pace of events. My question (which likely will not be externally polled) is about committed Dems, normally pretty much in step with the party, and whether they truly prefer Biden or Option B.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
That doesn't give any information about the question I'm asking. Giving money to the Dem candidate doesn't mean the person making the donation prefers Biden to Harris (really the only other option).
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Why are you proposing an action that you concede would be a terrible idea? What is the point of this thought experiment? Everyone understands that the decision empowers a president to do evil shit (or rather more evil shit). Now we need organizing, not deus ex machina magical thinking.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Clinton petitioning to have that expunged or something would be kinda perfect (which is to say awful) for this moment so maybe he’ll do that.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I am curious what percentage of committed Democrats feel the same. Could see it being well over or well under half—I just have no clue. Since we don’t get a voice at this point, I hope Biden and his people actually look at polling data and take an honest approach (either way), but I kinda doubt it.
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
This is an important point from Kelly. Superhero Biden smashing fascists with his John Robert’s-gifted Thorhammer or whatever is so much less likely than Biden doing nothing or doing something fucked up with said power. I get why our minds go there but no, that’s just not the way.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
I hasten to add that in no way do I think that the primary process confirming Biden as the nominee was truly democratic. One can disagree with that but that’s where I’m coming from.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The lack of democracy within the Democratic Party is obvious but still painful in this moment. There isn’t actually a simple answer to the Biden stay/go question. But it’s a key decision we should participate in collectively in some way. Instead it will be made by a handful of not so awesome people.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes