so, i think individual performers are a whole different animal, so i’d exclude cyrus. but in general, using the pistols as the example here, it’s true that they were initially concieved (by mclaren and westwood) as a vehicle to market her designs and his shop
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
i mean, he tried, and they told him to eat shit (he wrote a bit on the second record that’s such a mess), which is a major strike against both 1 and 2
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
i mean, that’s what mclaren had in mind, but mclaren never had a grip on them at all, and the thing that makes it hard to parse is that both lydon and mclaren are and were shameless liars
0 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
not mutually exclusive
1 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
yeah, i have no idea what to make of it and won’t try until there’s more out about it, but conor oberst is typically the exception, not the rule
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
fwiw, my criteria is:
1. plays music written by producers/managers/label
2. public/personal life largely controlled by label (this one is subjective, i know, but important)
3. are part of a marketing strategy to sell items other than music
the pistols only meet 1/3 here
6 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
the reporting comes from a podcast that i have no knowledge of, and i have no idea of the veracity of their reporting (i literally mean just that, i take no opinion one way or the other)
2 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
1. had a questionably consensual relationship with a 23 year old nanny, 2. had a less consensual relationship with a 20 year old fan who had met him when she was 18
3 replies
0 reposts
16 likes
anyway, my main take on sex pistols: boy band or no? is that you have to come up with a consistent set of criteria that a group meets to be considered a boy band, and the pistols were so inconsistent that it’s impossible to see how you could apply it to the without applying it to basically everyone
5 replies
0 reposts
13 likes
right, oldham’s book makes a pretty good case for the stones having been, in at least some ways, a boy band up until they cut him loose, but in a lot of ways, the term doesn’t really fit, either
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
i mean, the beatles weren’t really the first, though, that was just how the label system worked, like, look at american rock or R&B bands from the 50s, and that’s really common
2 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
there are two categories of people who say it: people who don’t really know what they’re talking about, and people who really, really do and have an objective set of criteria they can apply (but it applies to a *lot* of bands not typically thought of as such)
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
this is where it gets messy, because once they start doing their own writing and arrangement, are they still a boy band? also, the pistols were doing their own writing from the beginning, which is another reason i think the label is inaccurate for them in particular
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
fuck you, vox
6 replies
2 reposts
31 likes
songwriting is probably the biggest one, they weren’t playing the producer or the labels’ songs. like, the sweet were a boy band, and it’s fair to call them up that up until fox on the run, after which, i don’t think it really is.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
labels and managers had so much more absolutely control over artists’ lives at that point, i don’t think there are any american or european groups you could point to now that are comparable, and haven’t been for at least two decades (south korean acts are more comparable)
0 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
i push back on this because i don’t think “boy band” in the 1960s is really applicable to “boy band” in the 2020s, but if we’re making that argument, it goes back further than the beatles
3 replies
1 reposts
10 likes
right, mclaren was interested in selling merch and causing chaos, but any plain reading of “boy band” indicates a pretty heavily controlled public image, which was absolutely not how the pistols actually worked
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
this is a controversial argument that i don’t really agree with, but if it applies to the pistols, it applies to the beatles and the ramones and the stones at various points in their careers, too
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
oh no problem, i thought that was the case, just wasn’t sure
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
i mean, in one sense, yes, they were a “boy band” in that they were assembled by a producer who was overtly interested in merchandising. but mclaren didn’t have the kind of grip on them that any other studio or label or producer controlled band had
1 replies
1 reposts
6 likes
yes and he was horrifically abusive toward them, dee dee in particular
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
which argument? because this seems like it’s complimentary to mine, unless i’m misreading you
2 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
yes, *and*, once they were together, mclaren had far less control over them than “boy band” typically denotes. johnny ramone had a much tighter grip on the ramones and managed them in a much more conventional “boy band” fashion
3 replies
0 reposts
7 likes
like, if the pistols were a boy band, then the ramones were very definitely a boy band, and they fit the stereotypical mold for that a whole lot more (and for a lot longer) than the pistols did, but no one ever dismissively writes off the ramones as a boy band
6 replies
1 reposts
13 likes
lydon is now and was then a liar, but most of NO BLACKS, NO DOGS, NO IRISH has been checked out as legit, and he wrote it during a period where he was far less invested in being a troll, and it paints a very complex picture of what the fuck everyone thought they were doing
1 replies
1 reposts
14 likes
guffawed in real life
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
the long and short of this is that “boy band” is inaccurate unless you’re classifying most bands before the mid-80s as boy bands or girls groups, and that malcolm mclaren, vivienne westwood and each individual member of the pistols all had entirely different motivations for being involved
5 replies
2 reposts
26 likes
on the other hand, it’s better than biden old
8 replies
0 reposts
36 likes
oh god, no, not sex pistols discourse again, please, no, i can’t do another fucking round of discourse about a complicated story that has multiple interpretations depending on who is doing the telling
11 replies
3 reposts
44 likes
oh sure, i don’t think anyone is counting this as a serious indicator of anything, it’s just a tiny anecdotal data point
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
there were like maybe two stories on desantis’ unusual (and disastrous) decision to outsource almost the entire campaign to a PAC, a strategy that trump is following almost to the letter
0 replies
0 reposts
25 likes
the polls are weird this year and don’t line up with anything, and frequently don’t even line up with each other. either campaigning fundamentals are horribly broken or polling is.
2 replies
0 reposts
16 likes
right, i don’t give it any predictive credence at all, it’s just an anecdotal data point, which is worth nearly nothing. but in the aggregate, it’s not worth *absolutely* nothing.
1 replies
0 reposts
15 likes
do you mean to tell me that lara trump may not have the best instincts for putting on a party convention
4 replies
0 reposts
32 likes
we aren’t even seeing the usual washington state schmucks blazing through town with their flag trucks
4 replies
0 reposts
25 likes
it’s mostly a grift, either the times or the post recently had a story about how much money they’re taking in, but also, i think flynn has always been moderately insane
2 replies
0 reposts
9 likes
right, like, his rallies are doing worse now than they did *in the middle of covid*
0 replies
0 reposts
23 likes
the last non-loyalist out the door at the RNC was their experienced SME for election law
1 replies
0 reposts
11 likes
some of them are threatening to try to fight trump at the convention if he doesn’t choose flynn but i suspect it’s all talk
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
donald trump is spectacularly unpopular and appears to genuinely believe their own bullshit about peeling black voters away from the democrats, which will lead to terrible strategies (insofar as they even have strategies)
4 replies
1 reposts
39 likes
i would not put it past trump to nominate flynn, to be clear, but it seems like they’re telling the truth about this being fraudulent.