I'm real tired of this narrative about environmental justice communities being "worried". They have serious and legitimate concerns about the climate, air quality, health, safety, and water impacts of building out hydrogen energy, none of which are being addressed by decision makers.
1 replies
4 reposts
6 likes
Big ups to this storm for putting like 150 gallons of water into my cistern in an hour
(If I were better at fitting metric to standard pipes it would probably be a lot more)
(Thanks Australia for selling me special rainwater pipes even tho they don't fit the PVC I can buy here)
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
This, from @amywestervelt.bsky.social, is so spot on:
drilled.ghost.io/why-do-ameri...
A particular way I think this manifests is "our" (American, white, elite, etc.) entitlement to having other people join if "we" bothered to invite "them." Whose table should everyone have a seat at?
0 replies
2 reposts
11 likes
Reposted by Emily Grubert
In other news, the Department of Energy is now using the phrase "energy democracy" to describe community meetings about carbon capture and sequestration infrastructure buildout in the Gulf South so energy democracy's new definition is "whatever fossil fuel companies want".
1 replies
13 reposts
33 likes
By far my most strenuous argument against the (on its face reasonable!) suggestion that CDR is pollution control and so we should let it be pollution control is that *CDR is a very limited resource*. It's kind of like if we only had enough catalytic converters for 10% of cars. Useful but not enough.
3 replies
4 reposts
14 likes
I have still not solved the significant figure issue, fair warning 😂
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Oh by the way, the ethanol-equivalent gallon is defined statutorily as a number of btu that is not the same number of btu in a gallon of ethanol
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
I teach a pretty broad mix at this point! Lots of engineers but I'm in Global Affairs so get a decent number of people from pretty different backgrounds. We do a *lot* of practice, in and out of class -- I feel you!
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
my students: y u make us do so many unit conversions
my summer: how many ethanol-equivalent gallons of methane does this wastewater treatment plant produce
2 replies
0 reposts
14 likes
My basic summary of climate policy at the moment is that everything says ZERO EMISSIONS in big letters and then defines “zero” as “net” (not) zero in very very small ones
3 replies
1 reposts
11 likes
Hahaha yessss
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Since I’m cranky, let me yell again about how avoidance offsets 1) don’t work in a zero emissions paradigm and 2) pose an intractable justice problem by allowing the rich to appropriate “cheap” mitigation from groups that will eventually need to secure mitigation themselves
0 replies
1 reposts
6 likes
Reposted by Emily Grubert
Forget stopping a genocide, we've got an election to win for the planet is a really good encapsulation of why U.S. climate folks have failed to build a broad coalition for decades.
2 replies
8 reposts
37 likes
Always remember: even the best possible offsets* you can imagine are incapable of delivering (net) zero emissions
*here referring to avoidance rather than removal offsetting
0 replies
8 reposts
33 likes
Reposted by Emily Grubert
The Biden Admin is out today with "principles" for voluntary carbon markets.
I'm seeing misleading language in coverage on this so want to make sure we're all clear: "principles" are not the same as "guidelines" or "rules" when issued by the US federal government.
Principles are mere suggestions.
1 replies
20 reposts
46 likes
Deeply grim how much space for future wars my town left on the new war dead memorial
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
We made it through most of the USS and cliffs YouTube channels tonight 😂
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Watching American steel producer propaganda videos and correctly called which kind of crane they were using for a big project — so, a normal Friday night
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Emily Grubert
On a personal level, it really highlighted that climate change is deliberately an exclusive movement. There's nothing inherently difficult or specialized about it. These men did not spend their days studying climate change but they all understood- and resonated- with the idea of justice. 4/
1 replies
6 reposts
36 likes
Truly the degree to which technologism passes for inspirational is so depressing. Hearing that we need to focus on flying cars and space solar is the only way to inspire civil engineering students is worse than the sea level rise sessions
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
I never want to hear about how we don’t have flying cars again. They’re called Cessnas.
1 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
in this case I mean "not immediate specialists in the same technical area" -- but we also need to be able to talk to ourselves!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I’m not sure how to solve the issue where technical folks are told we need to learn to communicate to the broader public (true in many cases) and we end up practicing on each other in ways that make it harder to get into the weeds in contexts where that’s ok
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
no shade to the 9 year olds! but maybe we should pay them lol
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
My ongoing lolsob is that a lot of city parks / green stormwater projects vastly underestimate how much stuff costs because it turns out they like, have the local 4th grade class do the plantings for free. Looked out my window this morning and a bunch of 9 year olds are planting our park 😂
2 replies
1 reposts
12 likes
2040 Energy
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes