Hannah Walser's avatar

Hannah Walser

@hkpmw.bsky.social

Love 2 be ruled by these philosopher-kings

5 replies 13 reposts 77 likes


zenosAnalytic's avatar zenosAnalytic @zenosanalytic.bsky.social
[ View ]

"Im Not Touching You Im Not Touching You" now a valid defense in the united states.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Dagsly's avatar Dagsly @dagsly.bsky.social
[ View ]

Jackson had to write a separate concurring opinion, partially because she disagrees with Roberts' interpretation of the rules of football. and then she goes full-on with a The Last Boy Scout scenario.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


bac5665's avatar bac5665 @bac5665.bsky.social
[ View ]

How is the answer "surely, yes?" It seems obvious to me that there could be many scenarios where the answer is "no". Jesus, these opinions would fail a 1L exam.

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Alan Fisher's avatar Alan Fisher @amfisher.bsky.social
[ View ]

The well-known Harambe doctrine.

0 replies 0 reposts 8 likes


Dru Stevenson's avatar Dru Stevenson @drustevenson.bsky.social
[ View ]

This is like a 1L trying to come up with their own version of No Vehicles In The Park

0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes