So, like … can we all finally agree that the NYT just straight-up wants Trump to win?
(This is not me taking a position on whether Biden should be the Dem candidate, fwiw. I have an opinion on that, but I think reasonable people can disagree. I just think we all ought to be clear-eyed about this.)
0 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
Omg, Gorsuch’s Loper Bright concurrence is literally arguing that stare decisis is inconsistent with history and tradition
0 replies
2 reposts
17 likes
Reposted by Hannah Walser
Justice Jackson on SCOTUS dismissing the Idaho emergency abortion cases as improvidently granted: "Today's decision is not a victory for pregnant patients in Idaho. It is delay." www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
2 replies
42 reposts
126 likes
If you haven't yet read Justice Jackson's opinion in Moyle, you should—it's 🔥
0 replies
1 reposts
5 likes
I thought it might have been assigned to the Chief Justice as well, in which case it would've been released next—and it seemed to fit the theme of the other cases released today. But I was wrong! The last case was the EMTALA decision that accidentally leaked yesterday.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
PREACH.
0 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
Is it me or does it feel like they're gonna drop Relentless/Loper Bright last today
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Oof.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
NEED
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Love this! Can't wait to read
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
The Court has set several pendulums in motion, and we're all down here in the pit. I'm no rule-of-law expert, but I don't think this is how it's supposed to work.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
"Dismissed as improvidently granted." It's the Court's way of saying that it made a mistake when it agreed to hear the case in the first place. In this case, it means that enforcement of Idaho's law will be paused again while the case goes back to the lower courts to be litigated in full.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Specifically, it's remarkably craven and self-serving on the part of the three "moderate" conservatives. And it underscores a theme of this term: the Court's willingness to let people's rights—people's lives—dangle over the abyss indefinitely if it means avoiding embarrassment or opprobrium.
1 replies
0 reposts
11 likes
I have no idea whether this EMTALA ruling & its accompanying opinions will actually be issued in their current form. As it stands, though, Justice Jackson's partial concurrence expresses my feelings perfectly. DIGging this case isn't wise or moderate; it's cowardly.
1 replies
2 reposts
18 likes
"judges are not like pigs" omg 🐽
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Reposted by Hannah Walser
Kavanaugh reassures his friends Alito and Thomas that nobody's allowed to be mad at them for taking bribes
1 replies
31 reposts
106 likes
Reposted by Hannah Walser
Jackson, spitting fire: "Snyder’s absurd and atextual reading of the statute is one only today’s Court could love."
Of federalism concerns: "[W]oulds, coulds, and shoulds of this nature must be addressed across the street with Congress, not in the pages of the U. S. Reports."
2 replies
62 reposts
322 likes
So many gems in here. "And as for the supposedly 'fleeting' nature of the numerous references to potential consequences, death threats can be very effective even if they are not delivered every day."
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
Incidentally, it seems like Kavanaugh decided to use his concurrence to lecture his female colleagues, especially Barrett, on the True Meaning of Originalism? It's one of the most vapid and condescending things I've ever read
4 replies
1 reposts
15 likes
No no, you don't understand, every method that reliably gets conservatives what they want is objective and every method that doesn't is fuzzy and capricious
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
(In case it isn't obvious, this is not an endorsement 😬)
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes