|
Joshua J. Friedman@joshuajfriedman.com |
Sotomayor, for the liberals, on the decision that the SEC (and presumably other agencies) can't levy civil penalties on lawbreakers without a jury trial: "Congress had no reason to anticipate the chaos today's majority would unleash after all these years." www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23p...
8 replies 86 reposts 247 likes
|
ariel gordon
@arielgordon.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Unleashing chaos is basically all this court does.
1 replies 3 reposts 45 likes
|
CircusNoBread
@berkeleyeve.bsky.social
[ View ] |
the SC is the in the BurnItDown Gang
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Christopher Quirk
@christopherquirk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Great, so let's put corporate chiefs who break the law on trial in criminal courts instead, like they do in the EU, and jail them if found guilty. I imagine it will be more effective at curbing lawbreaking than fines, which are paid by shareholders and consumers anyway.
2 replies 5 reposts 42 likes
|
Peter Gratton
@petergratton.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's way too on the nose that, among all else, the Roberts Court's longest influence will likely in closing down vast area of the law from dealing with fraud and corruption.
0 replies 0 reposts 10 likes
|
Jenne (she/her)
@librarianjenne.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That’s an odd assertion on her part.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Jack Frazee
@jack-frazee.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Law in the past four years: 🙃
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Roland Muts
@rhcmuts.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Flood the zone with chaos.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Wait, what?
@johnnyphenomic.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It feels like a good day to start consistently referring to Alito et al as the court’s “radical far-right majority”, rather than continuing to pretend their decisions “conserve” anything.
0 replies 1 reposts 9 likes