|
Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social |
The Supreme Court’s right-wing majority keeps justifying its awful decisions with ludicrous claims to “history” that no historian would support.
13 replies 70 reposts 277 likes
|
Kevin M. Kruse@kevinmkruse.bsky.social |
The Supreme Court’s right-wing majority keeps justifying its awful decisions with ludicrous claims to “history” that no historian would support.
13 replies 70 reposts 277 likes
|
donut
@funkndonuts.bsky.social
[ View ] |
oh yeah lib what would you know about history! oh. right.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Kaerick
@kaerick.bsky.social
[ View ] |
They just legally denied scientific expertise, of course they're not going to accept historical accuracy that they legalized bribing them to ignore.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
SoFloBlue
@sofloblue.bsky.social
[ View ] |
CNN fucked us last night, SCOTUS has been doing it to us for the last couple of years. It’s time for a resurrected Black Panther party, Students For ADemocratic Society and the like. We don’t have guard rails anymore to protect our Democracy
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Daniel Tuttle🌵
@danieltuttle.com
[ View ] |
Their justifications are like every other Republican in each body of government: they mean nothing, and their being hypocritical is half of the point. Them making us mad might be the other half.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
@briancullen.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Taney Court: We know just how to solve this vexing slavery problem from the bench! Roberts Court: Hold my beer.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Jack Sprat
@jacksprat39.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Thomas Heaney
@captainabraham.bsky.social
[ View ] |
What's next? The Federal Reserve isn't allowed to regulate banks or change interest rates for the funds it loans?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Al G Rhythm
@algrhythm.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"agencies have no special competence in resolving statutory ambiguities. Courts do." Counterargument: Clarence F***ing Thomas.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
empty seats can't melt supreme court justices
@emptyjetseatbribes.bsky.social
[ View ] |
originalism somehow magically aligns with their policy goals. the sec case was so fucking annoying. like the sec was created for a reason
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Thanks For Sharing, Jerk
@thx4sharingjerk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Wait let’s get Shelby Foote’s opinion
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
WasteLandRover
@wastelandrover.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Hey, remember back in the good old days when some thought 9 people with lifetime appointments and no check on their authority maybe sorta had too much power? They just gave themselves more.
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Michael Hattem
@michaelhattem.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The court engages in its own specific version of memory construction when it comes to “the framers.”
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes