Kevin Elliott

The Supreme Court of the United States thinks this is *not* corruption

Jun 26, 2024 at 15:28 UTC

8 replies 53 reposts 117 likes

Pwnallthethings @pwnallthethings.bsky.social
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 15:30 UTC

well. Says it's not corruption. I'm not sure even they really believe it

2 replies 2 reposts 36 likes

12MileGeo @12milegeo.bsky.social
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 17:02 UTC

Legalizing a clear quid pro quo is quite a stretch.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes

Sean Eric Fagan @kithrup.bsky.social
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 18:32 UTC

It is, of course, entirely setting the stage to ensure Thomas isn't charged with a crime.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes

Seth Trueger @mdaware.org
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 15:30 UTC

0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes

Greg reinvented @gregwalk.bsky.social
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 20:13 UTC

I think "quo pro quid" makes it legal...

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes

Steve Uncle @the-barely-jew.bsky.social
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 15:50 UTC

They haggled him down $2k. That's the funniest part. Like they had a corruption coupon.

1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes

@paulsemenza.bsky.social
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 20:06 UTC

Well, they do trade votes for fishing trips...

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes

Tommy @tommyg.bsky.social
[ View ] Jun 26, 2024 at 15:39 UTC

WTF

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes