Consider my mind boggled. In 1968, Columbia demonstrators literally held a Dean *hostage* for 26 hours, and not only did he not retaliate after being released, HE WROTE SOME OF THEM REFERENCE LETTERS.
And Columbia still considered their response in 1968 so excessive that they wrote a 50 year retrospective discussing how much they've learned and changed.
Meanwhile, at UNC, interim Chancellor Lee Roberts intends to pursue legal and institutional action against anti-genocide protesters he already subjected to police brutality. So that’s where things are in 2024.
I mean, as a Navy man, he probably knew captive Navy pilots held by the Vietcong in conditions far less comfortable than faculty offices at Columbia.
I suspect that the issue at Columbia had to do with "outside agitators" calling and messaging the dean and mayor, not intrinsic to the protesters.
I really think there's been two shifts in culture that make a difference here. I think since the sixties, overall, people are moderately more apt to applaud petty vengeance, and much more likely to fear other people in general. Older people especially seem more deeply afraid, even in my lifetime
Sounds like he was a smart man who understood the value in disobeying orders. Understood that the intention behind the actions was not to harm, but rather gain public attention for the issue they were demonstrating for.
In the 1980s they occupied the law dean's office and she negotiated with them until 10 pm, after which different professors stayed up all night negotiating with them until morning, when they reached a settlement. That dean was Barbara Black.
I'd like to see photos of those demonstrators ...
I can't white figure out why they were handled differently back then, but I think seeing photos of them might help me understand
In 1992 protestors blockaded Hamilton Hall and trapped the dean, Jack Greenberg, in his office for seven hours. He did a phone interview during it and said, “I went on to the first wave at Iwo Jima. This is nothing.”