|
executive editor, barbell quarterly@swolecialism.bsky.social |
The Roberts court knows that it's safe to hand unlimited power to abuse or kill political rivals to the president even when a Democrat holds the office because Democrats wouldn't do it
5 replies 45 reposts 256 likes
|
Jo_clever_ke
@insidejoke.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's faulty logic, even ignoring the GOP, because on a long enough timeline nothing is assured. Another big reason this decision is so stupid.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Audi HD
@kh0rish.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I also think with that wishy washy ass “unofficial” they would try to declare any moves a dem president make in that direction an unofficial act
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
B
@bryyyyguy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Believing in norms when your opponents play for keeps
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Just here to chill
@garbagearsonist.bsky.social
[ View ] |
No, because if you as a voter fail to do the right but hard thing it's the end of democracy; but if Joe doesn't do the very thing Justice Sotomayor just said in a SCOTUS dissent he can do without repercussion, that's just respecting norms
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
ol tonyo
@fraustian.bsky.social
[ View ] |
yeah, this is honestly where it'd be nice to have a more energetic president. To literally threaten this court in a speech with what they appear to sanction
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes