|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
jesus christ why
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus@thewanderingjew.bsky.social |
896 followers 948 following 15972 posts
Formerly Ahasuerus. Threadbare in coat, heart, body, and brain
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
jesus christ why
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Faine Greenwood
@faineg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
needless to say, while I don’t hate or even really think about most people I block on the internet, if you’re a Greyzone Putin and Assad toe-sucker, I would like you to know that I specifically and personally hate you.
2 replies 1 reposts 51 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I don't necessarily need to have more of a reaction than "ew" to that kind of thing. Which is just a gossipy emotional reaction, not like, a judgment.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Talking to YOU, Captain von Trapp.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I would say, as an aside, that the conclusion of "if someone has this condition, nobody should take the risk of having a sexual relationship with them" is a bad one, but also, it's much easier to just not fuck your nanny.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's an unfamiliar enough condition that I appreciate any context, around this matter or otherwise!
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
George Pearkes
@peark.es
[ View ] |
How every new federal rule making will go from now on. *FTC BAN ON WORKER NONCOMPETE AGREEMENTS DELAYED BY JUDGE
3 replies 14 reposts 35 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I do not think it's clear he's not up to the task, tbh. Or at least, that he's any less up to it than Harris or others put forward.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
yeah - it also does not sound like it's a condition that's likely to manifest in "I think I was violently attacked by this person" false memories?
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
giddyap
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
There are a ton of people who are shitting bricks but none of them are anywhere near the president, and most of them are going off what they saw on TV, not any interactions with him.
0 replies 1 reposts 11 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
sorry, a few too many negatives in there - it's that you don't think people need to work to avoid triggering it?
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah. Not great even in his version.
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I saw that but apparently all in the context of the same podcast series? Did he really cooperate with them?
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Did he comment?
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Basically the premise is that the people who answer polls are not typical of their demographics, and that they’re more conservative. I can believe it but I can’t say I have a strong case
0 replies 1 reposts 6 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Basically, I think (a) the polls might be wrong, but (b) we won't know until we know, and who the eff knows.
2 replies 0 reposts 9 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think the problem is that Biden can't do any events without looking old. Because he is old! Which is distinct from any evaluation of his abilities, but the only thing that people seem to be looking for.
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The GMA interview is done, but not yet aired, right?
2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Which may be the most important conclusion anyway; this is politics, perception is reality, etc.
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
yeah, I would say that data point is extremely suspicious, but may be hard to generalize from.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah - though that would suggest that Biden's *actual* condition is irrelevant to this.
1 replies 0 reposts 12 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah, that's what's bizarre. He's clearly around! There's plenty of film now if you want to evaluate how he sounds on your own. It's just entirely left out of hte discussion.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
But it's not universal; NC-SEN polled at R+5, finished as R+3. OH-SEN was R+7%, came out R+6%. Etc.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
2022 polling shows some warts, so that's something. Fetterman's polling average was -0.5%, he won by just under 5%, which is pretty big error!
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Like, the default here is that the polls are basically right. Maybe wonky deep in the crosstabs because of small sample sizes, but when you combine multiple polls, well, there's definitely enough of a sample to make statistical predictions.
2 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's definitely cope, but it may pay off.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We got Tina Smith, so, it went well?
0 replies 0 reposts 17 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Turnout by year: 2020: 66.6% 2016: 60.1% 2012: 58.6% 2008: 61.6% 2004: 60.1% Democratic votes: 2020: 81M 2016:65.8M 2012: 65.9M 2008: 69M 2004: 59M
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That is an interesting point
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
yeah, though tbf, Biden's polls have been bad the whole time
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah, it is June and not October, after all
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah - there are good reasons to think the polls are fucked up, but it's not conclusive.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
He's referring to the literal vote at the convention.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That's plausible! But I think a lot of them are likely to not vote again.
1 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Overall, we'd need to see the polls be systematically wrong, such that Biden is punished in the same ways, pretty repeatedly, rather than those polls reflecting reality.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah - I don't want to unskew the polls, but it is wonky. Biden leads among anyone who voted in 2020, so the gap is entirely people who skipped 2020.
2 replies 0 reposts 15 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
If they want Trump to win, they wouldn't demand that he drop out because then he wouldn't win. If they want Trump to lose, then he wouldn't listen to them.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The only relevant question, really, is if it changes anyone's vote
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Who is Spitalli?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Adam's point is that this is the best way to beat Trump, and that the only thing that matters is beating Trump.
1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Everyone's giving up, it's a question of which side gives up faster.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Anyway, I e-mailed Spitalli, let's see
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I don't know if you need a real e-mail address to confirm a filing, which would be a reason that it's not a more fake one
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
That's probably the best guess, though lord knows who they're hoaxing.
1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I don't know why they would have faked it, been caught, and then faked it AGAIN though, except that they're all freaks.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah, it is suspicious.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The old filing was just FEC 1, and it's still in their database, but they never seem to have filed FEC2
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So at the very least, it's a BETTER fake.
1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Buttadeus
@thewanderingjew.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Yeah, poking around now. It's definitely a NEW filing, this one went up last night at 8:33, the other one was June 26. It's naming the Committee Trump-Flynn 2024, and is registered through Bulldog Compliance, and signed by Charles Gantt instead of Bradley Crate.
3 replies 0 reposts 2 likes