Reposted by B-squad leader
www.mediamatters.org/project-2025
3 replies
43 reposts
135 likes
I genuinely think JK Rowling is so dumb that she doesn’t realize, when she claims trans women in female spaces are just straight men trying to get sexual pleasure, she’s opening the door to the idea that lesbians should also be barred from spaces where women disrobe.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
He knows the first American Revolution was to rid ourselves of a king, right? Not to create one? Fuck this guy.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I’ve often wondered what it was like for populations in our past’s darker times to have to live through such tidal waves, powerless to stop them, knowing they could take years to recede. Now, here I am with my feet in rising water…
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
When I left Twitter last month, I kept my account but locked it. I get daily emails from Twitter telling me how many notifications I have. The number is always 169. Elon is a child.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Y'all, how funny would it be if Trump stroked out this week?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Shit. I'm going to have to make nice with KHive to prevent a fascist administration.
1 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
SCOTUS be like "Giving the Executive branch sweeping powers (except when it comes to writing regulations) and immunity from crimes is exactly what the Constitution's framers intended. We just happen to be the first Court to figure it out. Don't hate us because we're smart."
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Don't underestimate the damage Trump can do by using Schedule F to staff the IRS with partisans and have them audit everyone who opposes Trump. And how comfortable will anyone feel when donating to left/liberal political causes when names/donations are public record?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
When the future kids ask me how WWIII started, I'll start with "It's kind of boring actually. Decades ago, greedy people who ran American banks figured out how to make money by bundling dicey mortgages into a new kind of investment vehicle…"
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
HOW CAN SOMEONE WHO ISN'T PRESIDENT PERFORM AN "OFFICIAL" ACT?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
And Project 2025 will surround him with an army of loyalists… on top of the outside militias who would LOVE a tactical op to be assigned by their King.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Our entire system is based on the consent of everyone involved. So in theory, the only way a President can do horrible things is if people comply with their orders. There's a glimmer of hope until you remember who Trump surrounds himself with. And Project 2025 will give him an army of those freaks.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
I friend just asked me if Trump could make himself dictator. My reflexive response was "no." Then I thought about Trump being able to suspend the 2028 vote certification and how there might be know way to get him to leave office. Then I read this Drezner piece. FUCK FUCK FUCK
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Transphobia is a helluva drug
0 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
It's not like we'd even necessarily know who told who to do what since all communications would be privileged anyway.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
January 2029. President Trump suspends the Constitution, refusing to let votes for the winner of the "corrupted" 2028 election be certified in Congress. Arguably an "official" act to protect the republic. A coup with absolute immunity, and courts cannot question his motives, per SCOTUS.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Am I correct that it's only the President who is immune? Like, the crime isn't suddenly not a crime. It's still a crime but the President is the only one who can't be prosecuted. Or does "the Executive Branch" extend to anyone following an Executive order?
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
It's a clarification of the Nixon quote:
"When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal FOR THE PRESIDENT. Anyone else involved will have their life turned upside down."
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
We need a campaign to let everyone around a Prez know that just because they're given an order, that doesn't make it legal for everyone involved. It's only the Prez who is immune. Let them all know THEY can be prosecuted. And don't use "But they'll just get pardoned." as an excuse to do nothing.
1 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
The greatest Presidential scandal in the recent era, that has led to adding "-gate" to every subsequent scandal, was perfectly legal according to this Supreme Court.
Six disgusting fucking hacks.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Who are these people who see a choice between 2 administrations with many dramatically different views (women's rights, LGBTQ rights, religion in govt, infrastructure, etc,) and think "I'm cool either way, but the lying one had more energy, and I liked that."?
4 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
Reposted by B-squad leader
It's hard to even imagine the limits of the power that SCOTUS has just handed the president. If you can keep 34 senators and the military on your side, you can do anything.
24 replies
210 reposts
677 likes
I’d wager SCOTUS purposefully chose not to define official vs unofficial precisely so that they could hold one standard for R’s and another for D’s. They’ve predetermined the outcome!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
A sitting President running for a 2nd term has two separate jobs: President and candidate. His acts as a candidate cannot be “official” so asking Brad Raffensperger to find votes “we need” cannot fall under the immunity umbrella. If it does, nothing means anything.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
A sitting President running for a 2nd term has two separate jobs: President and candidate. His acts as a candidate cannot be “official” so asking Brad Raffensperger to find votes “we need” cannot fall under the immunity umbrella. If it does, nothing means anything.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
SCOTUS truly believes in protecting and defending the Constitution, which is why they made themselves and the President much more powerful than the Legislature, which is actually named first in the Constitution. Cool system!
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by B-squad leader
Yup
2 replies
10 reposts
56 likes
I mean, if you're asking a Secretary of State to "find" you more votes, that's you acting as a candidate, not an official act as the President. Come on. Hatch Act, anyone?
0 replies
2 reposts
8 likes
If Trump is an "existential threat to American democracy" then it's Biden's Constitutional duty to do this. Not my opinion. Just following the logic.
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
An OFFICIAL Presidential act, according to SCOTUS:
"I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have." – Donald Trump to Georgia's head of elections in 2020
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Hmm. Does their obsession with social media's "anti-conservative bias" override their deference to private business interests?
So any public accommodation in private hands must allow you to say or post anything you want? If you refuse to make a cake with 2 men's names on it, I guess I can sue?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
"Defend Israel" is such a shallow rallying cry for so many people that they're willing to tolerate (or ignore) Israel's continued reliance on anti-Semites to sustain their myopic worldview.
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by B-squad leader
Biggest campaign story ever: using a private email server that could hold top secrets but doesn’t and could be breached but wasn’t.
Tiny story: stealing top secrets. Hiding them in a bathroom. Taking them to NJ. Showing them to foreigners. Meeting with foreign governments.
16 replies
291 reposts
1174 likes
Biden has already stated that Trump is an existential threat to our democracy, so Biden's Constitutional responsibility, if SCOTUS rules that Presidents are immune from prosecution, is to take Trump out. That's my read of the situation anyway.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by B-squad leader
The correct response to Chevron being overturned is for every single environmental group to start filing millions of lawsuits, right now, today, arguing that various regulatory decisions didn't go far enough.
Absolutely flood the zone.
35 replies
1080 reposts
3313 likes
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Thomas and Martha Wayne’s extended family must’ve been like “Who will take care of sweet little Bruce?… Wait, what?”
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by B-squad leader
YES THAT WORKED SO WELL AND DID NOT AT ALL THROW THE PARTY INTO A DIVISIVE NOMINATION CONTEST AND LOST ELECTION THAT WOULD HAUNT IT FOR THE NEXT HALF CENTURY
90 replies
389 reposts
1935 likes
Reposted by B-squad leader
Once again, debates don't matter... www.nj.com/news/2024/06...
18 replies
42 reposts
214 likes
If you sit through ads on Hulu (which are clumsily cut into a show with no space after the dialogue), then you rewind to catch something that happened just before the jarring ad, you shouldn’t have to rewatch the ads. Is that unreasonable?
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Gee, might a media apparatus controlled by a handful of billionaires see a two-fer from Biden withdrawing?: They get more clicks thanks to a horserace within a horserace. And no Biden in ‘25 means the Trump tax cuts might continue.
I can’t imagine those obvious incentives cuz I self-lobotomized.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes