Here's the announcement from Heritage that they've hired McEntee for their PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION PROJECT. They note that McEntee headed up the Presidential Personnel Office for Trump at the end of his last administration. This is not complicated people. www.heritage.org/press/former...
3 replies
41 reposts
109 likes
Project 2025 is full of attacks on publicly funded, desegregated, pluralistic education.
Manufactured populist outrage against education is a classic sign of rising authoritarianism.
Re-upping my @insidehighered.bsky.social article on these connections.
www.insidehighered.com/opinion/view...
0 replies
8 reposts
13 likes
The theory of popular government and inalienable rights is the most famous part of the #DeclarationofIndependence.
Today, we should also recall its indictments of the king: they charge him with abuses of power to corrupt legal and political institutions of self-governance. 1/2
1 replies
3 reposts
8 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
Dedicated to the proposition that all people are created equal.
Birthright citizenship
Equal protection of the laws
Due process of law
No race or sex description in voting
No titles of nobility
No insurrectionists in office
No cruel and unusual punishment
Happy Birthday America!
3 replies
18 reposts
90 likes
That’s right: the Declaration is a legalistic indictment of a constitutional figurehead. The cornerstone of American independence is that such a figurehead can never be immune from those charges—it’s the duty of the people to levy them “in the course of human events.” 2/2
0 replies
1 reposts
5 likes
The theory of popular government and inalienable rights is the most famous part of the #DeclarationofIndependence.
Today, we should also recall its indictments of the king: they charge him with abuses of power to corrupt legal and political institutions of self-governance. 1/2
1 replies
3 reposts
8 likes
I don’t understand why the political journalists claim to dislike social media—they rely on it for “reporting” every day.
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
Yes, even better said: they sell a poor quality product that makes the appearance of political journalism a lot easier, far more superficial.
0 replies
2 reposts
7 likes
And in its own way, this is in defense of the excellent social scientists who do survey research so well.
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
It’s always good to remember this fact, but especially these days: US political journalists rely on and enthusiastically encourage an entire pseudoscientific polling industry because dissecting polls is so easy and inexpensive compared to time-consuming investigative journalism.
6 replies
12 reposts
51 likes
There are no "liberal" or "conservative" ideas. That's the language of electoral advertising.
There are just...ideas.
Asking if there's "too much" or "not enough" of such content in classrooms turns educational spaces into extensions of political advertising + cable news TV. 1/3
1 replies
1 reposts
6 likes
The topic of DEI in public discourse has been subject to enormous amounts of misinformation.
www.insidehighered.com/news/diversi...
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
this entire crusade against diversity in hiring and admissions is based on the supposition that all white men are necessarily more qualified than any nonwhite person or woman who might be considered for the job. like, this lawsuit more or less states that outright.
54 replies
508 reposts
2066 likes
The classroom should be a space for suspending the normal temptation to reduce complex ideas, worthy of sustained discussion, to forms of partisan identity and electoral talking points. 3/3
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
Substantive academic studies of classical liberalism + conservatism are great evidence for this argument. Truly understanding them requires examining the many different sources of those political worldviews, their internal diversity, how they address shared questions. 2/3
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
There are no "liberal" or "conservative" ideas. That's the language of electoral advertising.
There are just...ideas.
Asking if there's "too much" or "not enough" of such content in classrooms turns educational spaces into extensions of political advertising + cable news TV. 1/3
1 replies
1 reposts
6 likes
The facts are *only* in dispute.
1. No official records exist about whether profs are liberal or conservative. That's a good thing--in a free society, we don't require such records. Any surveys are small, strictly voluntary, often poor in quality. 1/3 🧵
www.chronicle.com/article/why-...
3 replies
10 reposts
35 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
You'll have to read the WaPo piece for this entirely accurate take from @paulgowder.bsky.social that this lawsuit is racist garbage. www.washingtonpost.com/education/20...
1 replies
27 reposts
55 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
Oh, you thought the clowning stopped with the end of the SCOTUS term? www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/u...
1 replies
10 reposts
46 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
I have been saying since February that major media are 100% devoted to But Her Emails 2, but I didnt imagine it would get this bad. The day after SCOTUS stops the law applying to Trump, we have to scroll thru 4 fucking top stories on “Biden old” & an ad before getting to anything on SCOTUS decision
9 replies
161 reposts
499 likes
Me, about halfway through the semester when I worry that my students are getting bored.
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
A researcher on X responded to my critique this way (see below), as if it invalidated then.
Okay, great, let’s talk about that report and have a teachable moment…1/3
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
People still not understanding that the 2016 election was the most successful Russian intelligence operation in history is gonna end with tears in 2024. We have to stop playing on terms that don’t serve us.
3 replies
32 reposts
189 likes
But the larger point stands: asking whether faculty hold private liberal or conservative views tells us nothing about what they actually teach and research. An imbalance one way or the other doesn't prima facie mean anything about the quality of a university climate. 2/3
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Faculty responses in the 2016-17 HERI report were, like I said, totally voluntary. A threshold of faculty responses from each uni was needed to count, which favors certain institutions over others. So,
issues of motivated reasoning right away. 20k is also a tiny sample of overall faculty. 2/3
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
A researcher on X responded to my critique this way (see below), as if it invalidated then.
Okay, great, let’s talk about that report and have a teachable moment…1/3
1 replies
1 reposts
3 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
i think we should see the Trump v. United States ruling as a group of Republican apparatchiks taking their opportunity to vindicate Nixon and write the unitary executive into the Constitution. www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/o...
44 replies
306 reposts
1146 likes
Kind of you to say, many thanks. This topic is definitely part of the book. I hope you find it a useful read!
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
3. Reducing university teaching and research to artificial "conservative" and "liberal" categories only presents a parody of what being a professor involves. It misinforms the public about higher education when accurate and constructive information is most needed. 3/3
2 replies
8 reposts
56 likes
2. All faculty members are entitled to their private political views. Holding those views tells us nothing about what they teach in class and how. Huge non sequitur.
Law enforcement and armed services all hold private political views, but they're not psychoanalyzed this way. 2/3
3 replies
3 reposts
27 likes
The facts are *only* in dispute.
1. No official records exist about whether profs are liberal or conservative. That's a good thing--in a free society, we don't require such records. Any surveys are small, strictly voluntary, often poor in quality. 1/3 🧵
www.chronicle.com/article/why-...
3 replies
10 reposts
35 likes
Not hyperbole at all. The core idea of the Declaration is judging when a previously legitimate ruler has abused his office to become a tyrant.
0 replies
2 reposts
10 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
If we have more NYT/WaPo op-eds calling on Biden to exit than on SCOTUS mainlining an authoritarian presidency, that will give you a good read on where we are.
15 replies
153 reposts
642 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
No shame in feeling scared, overwhelmed and not knowing what to do. To me feeling one's feelings doesn't preclude taking action. These are confusing times. Give yourself some grace.
22 replies
450 reposts
1598 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
Things are bad but all the more reason for optimism of the will and rejection of doomerism and nihilism. Only way out is through.
99 replies
293 reposts
1475 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
SCOTUS is telling us that it has completely signed on to the project of a second Trump administration, which is establishing an elected autocracy.
48 replies
700 reposts
2858 likes
Reposted by Bradford Vivian
This is the ball game folks, the authoritarian green light laid out in advance.
Congress will not impeach Trump. And SCOTUS now blesses him with extraordinary latitude to do whatever he wants in power.
A second administration will not be constrained by Congress, the courts, the bureaucracy or law.
27 replies
445 reposts
1066 likes
The question I don’t think has been asked yet (and I mean it seriously):
Does the former president know what the official functions of the presidency are?
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Theories aside, I think that would be the effect in practice with the current court.
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes