Finally, Judge Kyle Duncan quoted @stephenking.bsky.social to close his dissent, and Judge Jacques Wiener was *pissed* on King's behalf. First image is from Duncan and second is Wiener's response, from the majority opinion.
This man CLEARY doesn't understand that it's the state and the people REMOVING THE FUCKING BOOKS who are the library police.
God I can't wait for King to respond and call this shit out.
Quoting Stephen King like he’s some hallowed legal text, is quite amusing.
Don’t get me wrong, I like King, and can see at least ten of his books on the shelf from where I am sitting, but I very much doubt he would consider his works constitutional touchstones.
Then getting it completely wrong…
Credit where it’s due, Wiener is on point and Duncan’s mental gymnastics to try to charterize ending book bans as “being library police” is some double-speak nonsense.
When Kyle Duncan say, “We are all the Library Police,” we should see it as more than a rhetorical flourish—we should see it as an expression of his future plans.
Last thing here: Subscribe to Law Dork. Tell your friends. Seriously. This shit is too serious, and there's a free option, so, please, if you're not already there, get on it. www.lawdork.com