Breaking: Judge Ada Brown, a Trump appointee in N.D. Texas, has blocked the FTCās noncompete rule, limited to the named plaintiffs, in an APA challenge as likely contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious. The rule is set to go into effect in September. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
2 replies
3 reposts
16 likes
I mentioned the spinelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts on @strictscrutiny.bsky.social last week, and I haven't been able to get it out of my head. So, I wrote about it today at
@lawdorknews.bsky.social ā>
1 replies
10 reposts
47 likes
Fun facts: Law Dork got new subscribers from 49 states and DC, as well as at least 35 countries, in June. (New paid subscribers from 40 states and DC, too!) Thanks, all.
2 replies
2 reposts
26 likes
The bottom line for me is that I just donāt have time for it. I *do* care ā likely too much ā and try to engage, but I have to have limits in place or Iām not going to be able to do the new work that needs to be done.
1 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Iām manufacturing consent for fascism by not *checks notes* writing about Scaliaās death every time I write about the Supreme Court?
I donāt know. I had to block them because I literally donāt have time to worry about that when there are actual stories to cover.
3 replies
0 reposts
16 likes
OK. Hope you enjoyed getting that off your chest. Iām going to go do work.
0 replies
0 reposts
0 likes
This is a nonsense statement, but, I wish you well.
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
š
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
If I spend time on 2016, Iāll let you know. 2024 is providing me quite enough to write on, though.
0 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
If you donāt follow me and you come into my mentions to attack me, I have to assume your attacks are not made in good faith because you have no context and are just spouting off. I donāt have time for that.
4 replies
0 reposts
80 likes
š
0 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
You provide an important service. š„¹
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Going on a blocking tear this morning, so be warned!
7 replies
0 reposts
93 likes
Iām not. And Iām done with you. I donāt have time for this performative bullshit. I have actual work to do.
1 replies
0 reposts
6 likes
OK, with that, I think weāre done. Carry on.
Thanks for your thoughts.
I will continue taking in peopleās input and adjusting accordingly, but I think Iām doing my job quite well.
2 replies
0 reposts
15 likes
Theyāll learn.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
No? I have smart readers who understand that every story doesnāt contain all of the information in the world about it. I write about SCOTUSās problems. A lot. And, will continue to do so.
3 replies
1 reposts
21 likes
Iām not sure what Iām āpretending.ā The court is. Iām worried about its effects on real people. Until those donāt matter, Iām going to tell people what they are. ā¦ I also cover the ethical questions surrounding the court at length, so Iām not sure what youād have me do. Just yell at them?
2 replies
0 reposts
23 likes
Night, all, and let us try to be good to one another ā and ourselves.
3 replies
1 reposts
78 likes
Biden is to meet with Democratic governors at 6:30p Wednesday, per White House schedule for tomorrow, just out.
0 replies
2 reposts
51 likes
Here was my second go: www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-dec...
1 replies
3 reposts
17 likes
Here was my second go: www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-dec...
1 replies
3 reposts
17 likes
At Law Dork today, a big-picture look at what the SCOTUS conservatives did in four decisions obliterating agency power ā cutting down congressional and executive power and building up the judiciaryās power ā over the past week: www.lawdork.com/i/146213411/...
1 replies
6 reposts
31 likes
NEW: "Even where the court appears to give power to someone else, be sure to look behind the curtain and see if Chief Justice John Roberts still has his hands on the strings."
This afternoon, at Law Dork ā>
2 replies
15 reposts
55 likes
I'll have much more going forward, but here was my first go at Law Dork at Monday's immunity ruling from the Supreme Court: www.lawdork.com/p/robertss-m...
3 replies
10 reposts
33 likes
I'll have much more going forward, but here was my first go at Law Dork at Monday's immunity ruling from the Supreme Court: www.lawdork.com/p/robertss-m...
3 replies
10 reposts
33 likes
Steve Bannon is in prison for contempt and Rudy Giuliani just lost his N.Y. law license, but John Roberts insists that invisible ink in the Constitution prevents Donald Trump, the ringleader, from facing charges for virtually anything that Trump can claim was an official act.
11 replies
144 reposts
548 likes
<3
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
The immunity decision was was another ruling ā to quote Justice Ketanji Brown Jacksonās dissent in this termās earlier corruption case decision ā that āonly todayās Court could love.ā
www.lawdork.com/p/robertss-m...
0 replies
4 reposts
33 likes
For the REAL dorks.
1 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
So only one "Munsingwear is not appropriate here" Jackson dissent.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
Reposted by Chris Geidner
"When it needs to decide a matter for the right, it can and does accept questionable, if not false, claims as facts. If the result would benefit the left, however, there are virtually never enough facts to reach a decision."
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social on the immunity ruling and the Roberts court:
1 replies
15 reposts
57 likes
In today's orders and as expected, SCOTUS GVR'ed ā granted, vacated, and remanded ā a bunch of cases for reconsideration, mostly in light of Loper Bright (Chevron), Rahimi (Second Amend.), or Erlinger (ACCA). This is what those look like:
2 replies
5 reposts
10 likes
In today's orders and as expected, SCOTUS GVR'ed ā granted, vacated, and remanded ā a bunch of cases for reconsideration, mostly in light of Loper Bright (Chevron), Rahimi (Second Amend.), or Erlinger (ACCA). This is what those look like:
2 replies
5 reposts
10 likes
The Supreme Court granted five new cases on Tuesday in its āclean-upā orders. Iāll have more on the rest of the orders in a bit. Hereās the full orders list: www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
2 replies
7 reposts
15 likes
Well, Iām tired.
5 replies
2 reposts
146 likes
Thanks!
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
Here is my first. www.lawdork.com/p/robertss-m...
1 replies
12 reposts
31 likes
Here is my first. www.lawdork.com/p/robertss-m...
1 replies
12 reposts
31 likes
Reposted by Chris Geidner
One line from Robertsās immunity opinion was particularly galling: āOur dissenting colleagues exude an impressive infallibility,ā Roberts wrote of Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson.
Is Roberts not aware of his decision on Monday?
Tonight, from @chrisgeidner.bsky.social ā>
9 replies
9 reposts
50 likes
Todayās SCOTUS immunity ruling was a political ruling more than a legal ruling, as is seen by the lack of law in Chief Justice John Robertsās 6-3 opinion for the conservatives.
My Law Dork report: www.lawdork.com/p/robertss-m...
6 replies
31 reposts
99 likes
There are so many stories to write about this Supreme Court term ā the conditional and hypocritical nature of its rulings, the damage it has done, and the warning it leaves with us. I am glad we are entering a period where I will be able to do some of that work. But, it's dark.
11 replies
47 reposts
342 likes
Loper Bright fallout: In Missouri, a federal judge asks parties in the challenge to the Biden administration's Title IX rules to brief the effect, if any, of Loper Bright on the case. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
1 replies
7 reposts
24 likes
Thanks for attending!
0 replies
0 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Chris Geidner
Had the privilege of attending Georgetown Law's Supreme Court in Review today. This was a terrific panel. From left to right:
Michelle Bratcher Goodwin
@mjsdc.bsky.social
@moiradonegan.bsky.social
@jbouie.bsky.social
Madiba Dennie
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
3 replies
1 reposts
8 likes
Itās not good, folks!
Iāll have more at Law Dork, but first, you can catch me at noon on NewsHour and at 1:25p on the Georgetown Law SCOTUS Term in Review panel.
Thanks for following along these many mornings. Subscribe to Law Dork if you havenāt yet! www.lawdork.com
1 replies
6 reposts
49 likes
That's that.
Orders at 9:30a Tuesday.
2 replies
2 reposts
29 likes
That's that.
Orders at 9:30a Tuesday.
2 replies
2 reposts
29 likes
From Sotomayor's dissent:
3 replies
37 reposts
137 likes
From Sotomayor's dissent:
3 replies
37 reposts
137 likes