|
Gautham FC@gauthamrao.bsky.social |
Chevron famously said, "Judges are not experts in the field, and are not part of either political branch of the Government." Today, Roberts and the other chaos agents on the court say: "Judges are the only experts in any field, and can dictate policy to either political branch of the Gov't"
15 replies 260 reposts 901 likes
|
Bruno J. Navarro
@brunojnavarro.bsky.social
[ View ] |
famously and correctly bsky.app/profile/brun...
0 replies 3 reposts 8 likes
|
3 Dog Dad
@3dogdad.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So amazing to a gen Xer like me that the whole Supreme Court project from the right was premised on replacing activist judges with those who showed deference to the elected officials.
1 replies 4 reposts 29 likes
|
Christopher Deutsch
@drchrisdeutsch.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Truly horrific
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Moderately Grouchy
@moderately-grouchy.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think what it says is that judges can rely on experts if they want to. Which is entirely different, and likely to produce appeals to federal circuits with rulings that will be in complete disharmony and will clobber SCOTUS's docket.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Dustin Du Cane
@dustinducane.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Oh I knew there was some fundamental constitutional principle the crazies broke again but I didn’t remember the name. Not being an American lawyer.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Eric Carlson
@9ericcarlson.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Experts in any field except for the flag choices of their spouses.
0 replies 0 reposts 15 likes
|
Timothy Noah
@timothynoah.bsky.social
[ View ] |
libertiesjournal.com/articles/a-p...
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Firk
@theflyingfirk.bsky.social
[ View ] |
/while/ ruling incorrectly on technical details.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Dan Mandell
@dhistoryman.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Now we need a Rahimi-style case (quickly) in which SCOTUS is confronted by a truly outrageous situation that required a fed agency's regs to stop immediate massive death and destruction, requiring Roberts etc to backpedal AFAP. Alas, climate change is too big for the bozos on this SCOTUS.
1 replies 2 reposts 5 likes
|
Brad Proctor
@bdproctor.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So that's good, right?
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Brian DeViteri
@bsbeamer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
We seriously need to vote these judges out. Wait a second…
3 replies 2 reposts 24 likes
|
Tommy G
@tg2.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So what does it take to add one justice for each of the unrepresented districts in the country? We really need to expand the court and write into law that there cannot be more than a 2-party majority or risk the balance as we are seeing now.
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
|
@processanalyzer.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Thats the game folks! Umpires can now rewrite the rules of baseball. The road back from this will extend beyond my lifetime and prolly yours too.
0 replies 1 reposts 6 likes
|
Marcas Ó Doibhilin
@marcasofadad.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Also, too: expert in the field Neil Gorsuch think nitrogen dioxide is the same thing as nitrous oxide. Let’s not disabuse him of the notion.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Bipolar Viscountess
@sharilyn.bsky.social
[ View ] |
IMPEACH
0 replies 1 reposts 0 likes