Every member of the commentariat class who spouts this stuff is just telling you that *they* never formed a moral opinion for any reason other than to look good. They are incapable of humanity, and therefore think that holds true of everyone.
To say and do anything for money is the very lowest of life. Even lower is when the actually believe their own bullshit. It's crazy and we should not allow them to inflict this shit on us.
This is EXACTLY why Trump thinks everyone is corrupt criminal cheating and gaming the system because that's what he does
He cheats in elections so he is assuming EVERYONE is
They are telling on themselves
During my time in college I was acutely aware of current events because we were discussing them in class and own our own outside the classroom. Being incredulous and appalled was a byproduct.
The student bodies of the fifties and earlier were immune from peer pressure or threats from above and supported the status quo based and genuine conviction arrived at upon extensive individual reflection.
The idea that nobody really cares about anything and everything is a conscious performance in the aim of selfishness and greed is so fundamental to the hegemony.
Because they're able to, for money, adopt and argue for any position you can imagine, they assume that the holding of opinions is something only assumed for advantage. It's an extension of the university debating society "This House Believes" bullshit.
Well, they are students. University, famously, is a place where no one learns or thinks about anything! (/s although there are those who’d prefer it to be true.
Can we also take a moment to just point out, protesting genocide does look cool. And that's primarily because it's a GOOD thing to do xD like these two are not mutually exclusive. But also protest genocide it's just the right thing to do.
but can’t it be moral and cool? Lots of moral things kids could be doing, how they channel their outrage is shaped by what their peers are doing, e.g. what seems ‘cool”. I may be an old person now but I was once a young person protesting SA apartheid, that was both right and cool.
Their lives have been dedicated to accepting the status quo, then building a resume & persona that is appealing to the authority it represents. They can't conceive of genuinely holding any view that doesn't serve a career. Ironically, they think they beat kids' peer pressure by subsuming adults'.
As a mature person, I have just formed an opinion of Nate Silver, which is 🤬🤬 🤬🤬 🤬 🤬🤬🤬🤬 Which I think would be the opinion of any mature person no matter their age.
Very well put. Age has nothing to do with intelligence, political opinion, morals, values or common sense. They really are just reflecting on who they were when they were young and they totally have the narcissistic view that everyone thinks like them.
Also even if students have come to "being against genocide is cool" without command of the finer details good! They don't need to be genocide scholars for that to be valid.
AFAICT, forming moral values out of some synthesis of your social groups’ (yes, we may align w multiple) beliefs is EXACTLY what we all do. Cf, Nazi Germany…anywhere, really
Seems that Nate is sneering due to his usual anti-democratic belief that those values count for less because they aren’t his
Judging others by one's own example is such an exhausting, ubiquitous human reflex. We call it "telling on yourself" these days because, yeah. It often really does.
I have a moral philosophy PhD, so I think I can say that the moral principle against genocide and killing children is not too difficult to reach, even if there’s no peer pressure.
It’s some of each, and also: peer influence does result in informed opinion formation as well. So if your peers take a moral stand, even if you join them to be “cool”, you may well develop informed moral positions.