“chaos in the house as the house of representatives refuses to confirm president harris’ vice-president nominee for the 17th time before the august recess” is not a headline that unilaterally harms republicans
Maybe it's not his decision, but I would've pegged Serwer as someone with the honesty to pull that piece after the critical flaw in his analysis came to light.
“if there is no confirmed vice-president, who certifies the electoral votes?” is not a question that i want to learn the answer to in november, though if anyone has an answer for it now, i’d love to hear it
I'm pretty sure that would harm Republicans. That's why they back down from every government shutdown. Because it really does matter when they act like petty children.
(And I don't think 'unilaterally' means what you think it means. Just saying. I think you mean 'exclusively' here.)
Oh, sweet Jesus. I thought it was just the Senate. That was bad enough.
He absolutely cannot resign. I mean, I thought it was a stupid fucking idea before, but now it's the worst idea.