|
b-boy bouiebaisse@jbouie.bsky.social |
this is actually an insane claim, lmao
19 replies 7 reposts 390 likes
|
Matt Ficke
@mattficke.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Bleakly funny when viewed alongside their claimed helplessness at determining what would make homelessness “involuntary” in the public camping decision. That ambiguity is too hard.
0 replies 0 reposts 12 likes
|
Jinesh Gheeya, MD, PhD
@jinesh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
When congress give them clear law…then they claim should be against something so nicely named as VRA.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
|
@oldcoach.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Funny that they are so expert but weren’t able to cite the correct chemicals in yesterday’s air pollution decision.
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Faine Greenwood
@faineg.bsky.social
[ View ] |
utterly fucking deranged
1 replies 0 reposts 34 likes
|
Murbs’ Sox
@murbssox.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It’s akin to an expert in a field with lots of coursework & institutional knowledge saying x, y, z is the right course to take with an issue & a snot-nosed law student from Harvard/Yale coming in & saying, “actually….” while having ZERO knowledge about what they’re talking about. It’s the Kushner.
0 replies 1 reposts 2 likes
|
En Buen Ora
@enbuenora.bsky.social
[ View ] |
COURTS--HAV--THE POWER!!!!!
1 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
@coffeeaddict.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I think we should just start calling justices Praetors and move this along
0 replies 1 reposts 9 likes
|
@seosamh.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The doctrine of papal infallibility comes to mind here, but applied to (GOP appointed) Supreme Court justices.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Alan Fisher
@amfisher.bsky.social
[ View ] |
T-Shirts being made right now that just say "Courts do."
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Thomas Most
@thomasmost.bsky.social
[ View ] |
feels like the kind of statement that will be pull-quoted in future history books (derogatory)
0 replies 0 reposts 9 likes
|
Rob Pollard
@robpollard45.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"Conservative" Supreme Court Justices: we are not only well-read, master historians, we are also technical experts on all matters of policy. Next we'll learn they could throw a football over that mountain, if they wanted to
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Joe Discenza
@jdiscenza.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Isn't the point of these agencies to hire people with special competence in their areas of concern? Like, that's a significant part of the executive branch's budget?
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Hannibal Tabu Dot Com (he/him/his)
@hannibaltabu.bsky.social
[ View ] |
So the court *now* knows better than the court *then*? Get that noise out of my office.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
[ View ] |
My jaw dropped.
2 replies 0 reposts 68 likes
|
Kevin OMalley
@holyshitimfucked.com
[ View ] |
Also, said judiciary cannot be found to have been bribed.
0 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
More Microplastic Than Man
@monsterisland.bsky.social
[ View ] |
It's a naked judicial power grab on the level of what Marshall gets accused of doing in Marbury
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
strive for pithiness. land on glib.
@scruffymane.bsky.social
[ View ] |
so basically the supreme court is the HOA of all things now.
0 replies 1 reposts 2 likes