Okay well turns out nothing cures imposter syndrome like going through immigration
The guy was like "A literary festival? Why were you invited?" and I almost said "I genuinely don't know" before recovering my composure and declaring "I'm an AUTHOR."
11 replies
36 reposts
648 likes
If anyone is still sceptical that X has become about 3000% more toxic in the last couple years, thought I’d share these comments from last night
(NB: I’m ok. This is just the new normal on X)
10 replies
12 reposts
36 likes
Reposted by Belinda Barnet
Calling a person "cisgender" is also banned by the Free Speech Absolutist: www.sbs.com.au/news/article...
As are criticisms from employees: www.cnbc.com/2023/10/13/e...
And writing critical articles: www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/04....
So violent videos are fine, as long as you don't offend Elon.
1 replies
6 reposts
25 likes
Content rules:
Kid posting location of Elon’s jet = banned
Graphic video of boy attacking someone with a knife = should not be not banned and you’re a commie for requesting we remove it
6 replies
34 reposts
85 likes
We should learn from the aftermath of the Westfield attack, where a false name for the attacker was trending for 24 hours: don’t rely on internet detectives during a news event.
Particularly on X, where moderation is now thin (and “verification” now unreliable)
1 replies
2 reposts
5 likes
Absolutely beautiful article on autism by Grace Tame in The Saturday Paper.
“It’s neither a tragedy nor a blessing. It’s not even a condition. It’s a neurotype. In the words of autistic actress and advocate Chloé Hayden, autism is “different, not less”. www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/comment/topi...
1 replies
6 reposts
19 likes
I think we need Channel 7 to apologise for reporting a social media trend as fact
0 replies
2 reposts
1 likes
The absence of responsible moderation on X (and the dismantling of verification) means it’s now completely unreliable after an event like this. It wasn’t always this bad, btw.
2 replies
4 reposts
22 likes
Internet detectives are usually not reliable, but it’s interesting that X allowed such wild (and inaccurate) speculation to trend in the first place
2 replies
1 reposts
7 likes
Twitter was wrong. Funny that.
1 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Reposted by Belinda Barnet
[werner herzog voice]
42 replies
715 reposts
2992 likes
*This is for a limited period, is for marks, requires kindness, and you’ll need to be an Australian business.
0 replies
1 reposts
4 likes
Does anyone here have a small-medium Australian business that needs a boost on social media?
I have some social media students who need a practical project (will require control of an account for a limited period) and we might be able to help you too.
Email bbarnet @ swin edu au
2 replies
5 reposts
9 likes
Me on ABC this morning: We can’t blame TikTok for systemic inequality.
“Police concerned about rise in TikTok 'crimfluencers' in Alice Springs as youth curfew continues - ABC News www.abc.net.au/news/2024-04...
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Now it gives special preference to crypto boys & neo Nazis (more recently, to a far-right extremist linked to the Christchurch terrorist).
I can’t imagine why advertisers are leaving in droves or the media is writing bad stuff about all that
1 replies
1 reposts
13 likes
Got fitted with my first hearing aid today. Can suddenly hear leaves rustling, keyboards clacking, people sniffing, fabric moving on my own body. What a racket.
How do you hearing people deal with all this sensory input on a daily basis?
5 replies
1 reposts
21 likes
Reposted by Belinda Barnet
The proposed US TikTok ban hints at why Australia must further regulate social media | Belinda Barnet
2 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
Good strong legislation would catch all that too
0 replies
0 reposts
3 likes
From me on @guardianaustralia.bsky.social today:
The proposed US TikTok ban hints at why Australia must further regulate social media www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
1 replies
4 reposts
6 likes
“The House of Representatives passed a bill on Wednesday that would require the TikTok owner ByteDance to sell the social media platform or face a total ban in the United States. t.co/3chHJ7ZMPj
0 replies
1 reposts
1 likes
(When platforms leverage their own massive user base for political purposes it just demonstrates the inordinate power that governments are usually trying to curb)
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
The difference in the US is that the government is already deeply suspicious of TikTok for geopolitical reasons. So it backfired.
1 replies
0 reposts
1 likes
TikTok is not the first platform to mobilise its own considerable user base against proposed government legislation, ie mobilising users for a political purpose.
Google did this in Australia against the News Media Bargaining Code.
2 replies
0 reposts
5 likes
Global news media having a conniption over a doctored family photo* might be a good thing if it promotes awareness of how to identify synthetic/modified images.
*the royal pic was probably not modified by AI, but that’s beside the point
0 replies
0 reposts
2 likes
Note to media covering Sam Kerr:
“Reverse racism” is not actually a thing. Nor is “anti-white racism”.
1 replies
0 reposts
8 likes
Reposted by Belinda Barnet
And, perhaps more importantly, Mute words, phrases and hashtags.
This thread ⬇️ lays out new features in the last update.
My most used new-ish feature is "Hide post" available now in the 3 dot menu. So can banish a single post. Poof! 💨
0 replies
1 reposts
2 likes