|
Mike Masnick@mmasnick.bsky.social |
This may be the worst thing I've read in a long time. It's embarrassing. www.nytimes.com/2024/07/02/o...
19 replies 20 reposts 109 likes
|
eevee
@eev.ee
[ View ] |
i can't even tell what the author thinks he's trying to argue here, he just... trails off
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
critter
@neocritter.com
[ View ] |
You'd think that time they ran an op-ed from Hitler would have dampened the paper's credibility a little.
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
@wanderingincode.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Including things you read yesterday?
0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes
|
Gojira1000
@gojira1000.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The NYT quit being a newspaper long ago.
0 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
|
@vraghuram.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Sad to see Tim Wu jumping the shark on this, especially considering his previous work on net neutrality.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
Bote Man
@boteball.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Now do the 2nd Amendment.
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
Charles Bryan
@charleshbryan.bsky.social
[ View ] |
The Newspaper of Record went with that headline?
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
James Debord
@jamesdebord.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Come on, Mike: it's totally possible to have the government censor Bad Speech while preventing them from ever limiting Good Speech. No, I didn't check the news yesterday. Why do you ask?
0 replies 0 reposts 16 likes
|
|
@grandmabates.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Wu begins by saying the goal is to have a free press and then goes on to argue that the companies who publish information should be completely constrained by not being allowed to make decisions about what information they publish.
0 replies 0 reposts 7 likes
|
Patrick Matthews
@matthewsp.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Bold move for a business which quite literally dependent on the 1st Amendment to run a piece saying "the 1A is bad, actually". But then I remember that NYT ran Tom Cotton's "Send in the Troops" piece, so...
2 replies 0 reposts 13 likes
|
Ace
@dygytylace.bsky.social
[ View ] |
not paying for the NYTimes to read our freedom is too much for them
0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes
|
Alexandra
@alexandratx.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Don’t read the bill maher opinion piece.
1 replies 0 reposts 3 likes
|
@pouncingbullfrog.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Talk avout going mask off, this is insane. No one's gonna take them seriously after this
0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes
|
e (they/them)
@certificates.bsky.social
[ View ] |
I would argue that: on the eve of electing an overt fascist is the *worst* time to run a piece against the 1A.
1 replies 0 reposts 6 likes
|
Susan Ballinger
@peculiarsusan.bsky.social
[ View ] |
0 replies 0 reposts 4 likes
|
Allen Garvin
@allengarvin.bsky.social
[ View ] |
"presuming...free speech protections apply to a tech company’s “curation” of content...weakens the ability of the government to regulate so-called common carriers like railroads and airlines" WTH does that mean? Railroads' core business is not in speech. What content would they curate?
0 replies 0 reposts 5 likes
|
Kevin Carson
@kevincarson1.bsky.social
[ View ] |
Old-line liberals are viscerally hostile to anything networked or distributed, and can't conceive of any approach to reform that involves decentralized self-governance rather than a mid-20th century industrial dinosaur model (see Frank, Thomas).
1 replies 1 reposts 9 likes
|
Chad Radish
@chadradish.bsky.social
[ View ] |
wow holy shit this guy is an absolute fucking subhuman ghoul
1 replies 1 reposts 6 likes