Look I get that “tenants by the entireties, and not by moites” is not an intuitive concept and most people needn’t grasp its abstruse particulars.
But one of the few groups of people who do are the eight associate justices of the Supreme Court
The degree of in-our-faces bullshitting in his excuse is far beyond room for reasonable doubt, but the media and our legislators will continue to treat it as a sincere explanation requiring no comment or analysis.
New precedent for anyone trying to get out of doing housework: "Well dear, as a joint property owner, you had the legal right to use the dishes as you saw fit to make dinner, and I cannot take any steps to interfere with those choices by washing them now."
The "funniest thing" is it's more than sufficient to silence the people calling for him to recuse himself from cases where this proves he cannot be impartial
