Key excerpts from the Supreme Court ruling that declared former presidents have immunity for their official actions reveal how the conservative justices view the power of the nation’s leader. Here's what we found.
Why does our newspaper of record continue down this weird path of not calling out the SCOTUS bad faith? They aren't making legal decisions or thinking about the power of the nation's leader, they are helping out Donald Trump. If they thought Biden would use this power, they would have done nothing.
I noticed you called for Biden to drop out due to a bad debate performance but you did not call for Trump to drop out when he was convicted of 34 felonies
1) that cost you 2 subscribers
2) fuck off for doing that
Bad use of conservative
Judicial conservatism is based on the idea of minimalism. This opinion is ANYTHING but minimalist.
This is a radical opinion.
It's time to leave conservative off the adjective-list, as now it's ambiguous.
This is a radical ruling in favor of politic conservatives
Maybe if the times remembered that the job of the press is to expose wrongdoing rather than to simply report both sides we wouldn't be in this predicament. I too cancelled my subscription today.