Paul Craig 's avatar

Paul Craig

@paulwcraig1.bsky.social

147 followers 234 following 95 posts

Father, Grandfather. Music mostly, some political discussion welcome


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

Not a lawyer,or American,but I thought it was pretty specific in its analysis.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

slate.com/news-and-pol...
There was much twisting to arrive at this. It's a horrifying conclusion

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

Durbin has sent a letter to Garland asking him to have a Special Counsel investigate Thomas. He was interviewed last night by Chris Hayes.

0 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Mina Li (she/her)'s avatar Mina Li (she/her) @codenameminali.bsky.social
[ View ]

turns out my state is having a contest on "I Voted" sticker designs, and I would like to show you the most metal one by a middle schooler:

110 replies 1199 reposts 5054 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Reposted by Paul Craig

Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

Miller wrote this. It's actually coherent, which is not his style.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Reposted by Paul Craig

Reposted by Paul Craig

Reposted by Paul Craig

Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

I know. And I was first introduced to him over on the hell site. He is one of my favourite follows. Thank you.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

I'm going to wait patiently. I may unintentionally provoked something.

1 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Nicholas Grossman's avatar Nicholas Grossman @nicholasgrossman.bsky.social
[ View ]

When I say the Supreme Court went beyond law, I don’t mean that I disagree with their interpretation of any legal text. I mean their immunity grant isn’t based in any. The Constitution does not address it either way. They invented new powers from nothing.

9 replies 42 reposts 171 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Reposted by Paul Craig

That Anonymous Coward's avatar That Anonymous Coward @thatac.bsky.social
[ View ]

*ponders* No matter what happens, there will be all of the appeals all the way to SCOTUS, where CalvinBall will reign & SCOTUS will reject appeals from people who can prove they were imprisoned through fraud so they have openings for all the Trump appeals.

1 replies 1 reposts 1 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

What wasn't serious about my question? I'm not a lawyer and I'd like to know.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

Apparently she's "Loose Cannon" for a reason and there is no rhyme nor reason to anything she does. But she does fear the 11th Circuit.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

I haven't seen any comments on it, and it's a serious case. I really hope to see discussion about it and what Jack Smith might have to do to keep it on track.

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

That's an album every serious collector or lover of music needs to own

1 replies 0 reposts 2 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

I've asked @akivamcohen.bsky.social this question,but not received a response as yet. But I think you've already thought about it as well. Is the decision going to upset the documents case? Or is it an entirely different set of circumstances?

1 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Popehat's avatar Popehat @kenwhite.bsky.social
[ View ]

“SEE DAD? I’ve destroyed two and a half centuries of America. WHO’S NEVER GOING TO AMOUNT TO ANYTHING NOW?”

32 replies 239 reposts 1432 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

You've laid it out in a manner that is easily accessible and clear. I think it articulated the issues so everyone, including non- legal people can grasp just how perilous this decision is.

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

No. God's apparently a Republican and his plenipotentiary is Trump.

0 replies 0 reposts 0 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

So,no then. Understood. Roberts has also said they expedited this decision,which may be a lie...

0 replies 0 reposts 1 likes


Paul Craig 's avatar Paul Craig @paulwcraig1.bsky.social
[ View ]

I read over on the hell site that this decision is appealable within 25 days. Two questions - is it true, and do you believe that Smith/DOJ will attempt it ? Non- lawyer here.

2 replies 0 reposts 3 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Chris Geidner's avatar Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner.bsky.social
[ View ]

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects Steve Bannon’s request to stay out of prison pending any remaining appeals of his contempt of Congress conviction. He is due to report to prison for a four-month sentence by Monday.

31 replies 87 reposts 482 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Hunter's avatar Hunter @hunterub.bsky.social
[ View ]

Roberts: And so this court decides that we, rather than scientific or policy experts, will hold all regulatory power. In unrelated news, it is legal to bribe us now. Kavanaugh: [Reaches under the bench, sets out little wicker tray] Kagan: Where ... where did you even get that. Kavanaugh: Church.

3 replies 48 reposts 174 likes


Reposted by Paul Craig

Reposted by Paul Craig